Cords of love and bands of mercy

The Communist at his root seeks to rid himself of conscience thus liberating himself from the burden of having to do what is right, true, and moral. Righteousness is a terrible burden for a Communist to bear; it stifles the very radical flame that is eating him up. It must be ridded of. This need of his has, as a matter of course, necessitated the denial of the self evident truth of ‘God is’ or as God put it, “I am”. Now with God and conscience out of the way the socialist has finally been enabled to set himself up as his own God (this is why the leftist atheists are attacking any semblance of God around the country as you have been reading in the news). “Life is great, now I can do whatever I want” (Be careful what you think. He that sins is the slave of sin and not free at all. If you don’t believe me just ask Dexter Manley the former Redskin). Now he can work freely towards a Godless “social justice” utopia (I hope that you can see the paradox of a Godless justice). Of course if there was any true justice in “social justice” they would not need to dispel “the righteous Lord” that loves righteousness and also not their own God given conscience.

Psa 2:2 The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying,
Psa 2:3 Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.

Of course the Lord who is out of their sight is laughing at them and will have them in derision should they refuse to repent (it must be terrible to be at war with someone you cannot see or touch; that would scare me). Now I shall proceed with my dissertation. Do you smell a rat yet? If not, I suggest picking up your bible and reading continuously. And why would the Communists care to work for “social justice” when they themselves have already consolidated most of the money and power to themselves. If you don’t believe me just ask you university professor what his or her salary is (maybe we need to redistribute some of that). Ask him or her how much power to influence he or she has over the minds of the students (and to think your poor parents are paying them through your tuition). How sweet is that? They are paying for your destruction and you thought they loved you (just kidding, I’m sure they love you very much). Back to the question of why would they work for “social justice”. This question is even more perplexing since the Communists believe there is no intrinsic morality, only relative right and wrong and no God to judge their behavior. They also understand their mortality. Since they think they are just evolved animals why don’t they just do what is truly in their hearts. Do you think the lion feels anything for the baby wildebeest or it’s mother when it makes a kill? After the lion is sated all the others just go back to grazing as if nothing happened because they are okay. They feel no compassion, no remorse, no shame. They do only that which they are made to do and are therefore blameless. Why does not the Godless Communist just do the same? Hypocrites! They espouse the idea that societal institutions (churches, schools, government, etc.) need to be eradicated as was stated by their icon, “everything that exists deserves to perish”. To understand the paradox intrinsic to their religion, all you have to do is simply apply the 180 degree translation twist, as I wrote before in a previous article. To recap: the true meaning of everything they say is exactly the opposite. Examples: social justice = terrible social injustice and oppression, hope = horrible despair, change = devolve to former oppression and tyranny, forward = regress to a failed ideology of Communism, redistribution of wealth = theft, fundemental transformation = utter destruction, etc.. Now this is where the road to Moscow forks. The Communists use their ideology and euphemisms to cover their personal ambitions from discovery. A good example of this type of Communist is Stalin, Mau, Castro, Black Panther leaders, etc.. Then you have your socialist variety of Communists or “Liberals” that feel a need to show to themselves and to others their moral superiority. Many of the Jews fall into this category. I am still working to figure this one out since the tyrannical theology of Communism is a death sentence to the Jews. Under the Communist rule, they will end up like Trotsky did with some  ice pick hope and change to his head and if the cousins and attack dogs of the Communists (that would be the Muslims) have their way, they will receive a little Khaybar social justice and loose their heads. Maybe they can join in with the both beautiful and musical Muslim chant prior to their demise, “Khaybar Khaybar, ya yahud, Jaish Muhammad, sa yahud,” which means, “Jews, remember Khaybar, the army of Muhammad is returning.” This chant is used as a battle cry when attacking Jews or Israelis. I’m not sure which of these choices would be better. I think I might choose the ice pick; that way they could have an open casket at my funeral. These socialist/liberal communists Jews seem to want to help the poor and oppressed people of the world to escape the imperialistic, racist, sexist, xenophobic, socially unjust, tyrannical America. But if America is thus why did their predecessors flee from Russia, Eastern Europe and Germany to come here? And if it were so bad there, why did they bring their Communism with them like a virus. They were fleeing from the evil that chased them and didn’t realize that they were the evil and carried with them the virus of communism (I guess the immigration officers at Ellis Island missed that little chestnut). And are they not free to go back to these countries? Is it possible that they hate the God who has pursued and driven them for their iniquity for generations and therefore hate America because it was founded in Godliness and righteousness? Just asking. Now I will help you this one last time to understand the meaning of this radical ambition I have been stating above. Again, apply the 180 degree translation twist and you will see that all the previously listed evils are actually what the Communists (both the capital and small ‘c’ variety) want to do and are now doing around the world. America is not the purveyor of these types of evils but is the last bastion of hope against such evil, or at least it was not too long ago. Maybe I can get a job as a translator for the State Department or some other government agency; what do you think?

Jon 2:8 They that observe lying vanities forsake their own mercy.

The Cords of God are cords of love and he binds us up in his mercies that are new every morning. Through His Jeshua He breaks the cords of sin and iniquity that bind us in spiritual death. Why on earth would anyone want to cut and break them. Are they perhaps, like the Jew Saul Alinsky, so intent on being their own god that he dedicated his book to Lucifer the first rebel who he said at least he won his own kingdom? (he doesn’t bother to mention that the kingdom he won is hell)

Psalm 107:8 Oh that men would praise the LORD for his goodness, and for his wonderful works to the children of men!

“The Issue Is Never The Issue”

As the 1960s radical said, “The issue is never the issue”. The revolution is and has always been the issue with the 1960s radicals who grew up and are now running the country, universities, and many other institutions in our society. The issues that are being thrown at society (black lives matter, the empowerment of women, homosexuality as a civil right, etc.) are only the summoning trumpet for the “useful idiots” to organize, in a communal way, around. The real issue is, as stated, the revolution. The original title of Saul Alinsky’s book “Rules for Radicals” was “Rules for Revolution”. All the Communists who now inhabit and orchestrate our government are adherents of the Alinsky model of community organizing and such. In accordance with Alinsky’s model they moved from violent revolution against the government to infiltrating the government, posing as Liberals (they are not your father’s Liberal). As they put it, they dropped the radical pose for the radical ends (they don’t where tie-dyed shirts, have long hair and call the police pigs anymore). A high profile example of this technique is Bill Ayers (who refers to himself as a Communist with a small ‘c’), a long time friend of Obama, in whose living room Obama launched his first presidential campaign. He started and led the Weather Underground terrorist bombing organization which was attempting to violently overthrow the government. Having escaped prosecution on a technicality, he went on to be a tenured university professor having never recanted his behavior and still proud of it to this day. He stated that he would rather be in the university influencing the thoughts of the students. This way he can have a much greater effect for Communism than as a terrorist bomber. He has dropped the radical pose for the radical ends. Obama, though he never met Alinsky, taught Alinsky’s techniques for the Alinsky organization ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now which is a euphemistic reference to Communism). Hillary Clinton did meet Alinsky and was enamored with him. She wrote her college thesis on him and has mastered the art of the lie. The list of high level Communist adherents is extensive and can be followed by a visit to the web site, “”.  This website put out by David Horowitz set off a great commotion with the Communists when it debuted. It names names and originally also displayed their pictures until the copyright lawsuits got to be too much. At that point Horowitz dropped the pictures. If there is anything the dark ideology of Communism hates it is the light. These people have abandoned “the radical pose for the radical ends” in order to cover their true intentions, a classic Alinsky tactic. Posing as “Liberals”, they are actually radical Marxists but if you knew that, the gig would be up and they would have to morph into another form such as say, “Progressives”. They are “liberally” “progressing” “forward” towards “fundamental” “transformative” “redistributive” “hope” and “change” (all innocuous euphemisms for Communism). Remember, since morality is relative and arbitrary to a Marxist, any deception he or she uses is only one of many tools to accomplish the ultimate Utopian end, Communism. Under this definition their lies are good lies. To them a bad lie would be telling the truth when it contradicted their goals. A good example of this would be the history teachings of the Jewish Communist Howard Zinn (Like his ideological twin, Noam Chomsky, could he be anything other than Jewish?),(as a side point the actor Matt Demon was Zinn’s neighbor and a Zinn enthusiast, a funny thing since Demon’s mother claims to be a Christian; just goes to show you do not inherit redemption). Even though Zinn knew he was teaching a false narrative concerning American history, it was a good lie because it was leading to a good end, Communism. If he were still alive he would consider, for example, David Barton’s teaching of history as a bad lie because his teachings are truthful concerning the founding history of America and therefore completely contrary to the Communist ideology. The issue is never the issue; the issue is always the revolution and America is the greatest impediment to “Social Justice” (AKA communist redistribution of wealth) in the world. Therefore, anything that brings capitalist, imperialist, racist America down is just or as the Muslims put it, “slay the infidels wherever you find them” (unless, of course, they have the upper hand; then you can pretend to be their friend until the time is right to slay them. But this is a good Muslim lie because it is in the noble cause of Allah). Frequently, as has been said, “idealism kills”. The Communist, John Lennon; however, dreamed instead of the long held idealistic Communist Utopian dream of “Imagine there’s no countries. It isn’t hard to do. Nothing to live or die for and no religion too. Imagine all the people living life in peace. You may say that I’m a dreamer but I’m not the only one. I hope someday you’ll join us and the world will be as one”. This song is indicative of his belief, as well as that of President Obama, in a communal worldly salvation. Though the socialist dream flies in the face of all historical reality would not all the atrocities that have been committed in it’s name be justified in pursuit of the Utopia? Not in my book. Wicked is as wicked does. There you have it, “Communism”. Socialism would be hard for me as a realist and not a dreamer to accept; for I know the innate wicked nature of man, as did the founding fathers of America, as did Jeremiah the Lord’s prophet (Jer.17: 9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?). But If the condition of mans heart then is thus, then man, being morally and spiritually bankrupt, has no hope of redeeming himself or any society as the Lord declared to Job in the 40th chapter of the book that is titled with his name and after a series of questions and statements to Job where the obvious answer from Job would have been no and I can’t if he had spoken ( sounds like the opposite of “yes we can”) ( Job 40:14 Then will I also confess unto thee that thine own right hand can save thee.). The socialist utopian dream; however, offers that it can redeem man even though it has no practical plan of how to accomplish this. What then if God who did have the means to pay for mans redemption made it so even though he owed it to no one. Then would it not be incumbent upon men to accept that salvation having earned non of it by thier own works as was declared again in the scriptures to the Corinthians: 2Cr 6:2 (For he saith, I have heard thee in a time accepted, and in the day of salvation have I succoured thee: behold, now is the accepted time; behold, now is the day of salvation.). Of course Lennon didn’t believe the scriptures; he was to smart for that. Communism does not work, has not worked, and will never work but even so, with his communist faith in tack, Lennon was able to believe it’s myths. It is only a dream of the envious, covetous, rebellious, strife full, and Godless man. The more things change the more they stay the same. Good luck everyone.