The more things “Change” the more they stay the same.

Why do you suppose the American communists/atheists have been rearing their ugly heads so much lately in the courts and in the press, attacking even any similitude of Christianity? Why do they spend so much energy attacking something they don’t believe in? Why not just go about their narcissistic lives? Do you think Christianity can co-exist with Communism? The leftist’s frenetic assault upon freedom will not rest but upon your destruction. You cannot ignore him. You will not placate him. You will not convince him. You will not be able to compromise with him. If you relax your guard, he will not rest, but will advance on you. If you sit on the fence, he will pull you onto his side. You must resist him at every turn. Peace through surrender or tolerance of tyranny will only result in your death (both physically and spiritually). Dietrich Bonhoeffer: “Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.” Either we will kill him or he will kill us. He will not peacefully co-exist with you nor will you be able to co-exist with him. The light and the darkness cannot have fellowship together. Cast out the communist and live or attempt to coexistence with him and die. 1 Peter 5:8 “Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour…”. Daniel 8:23 “And in the latter time of their kingdom, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king of fierce countenance, and understanding dark sentences, shall stand up. And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and practise, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people. And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.” 1 Thessalonians 5:3 “For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.”

Anatoly Lunarcharsky, the former Russian Commissar of Education:

“We hate Christians and Christianity. Even the best of them must be considered our worst enemies. They preach love of one’s neighbor and mercy, which is contrary to our principles. Christian love is an obstacle to the development of the Revolution. Down with love of our neighbor! What we want is hate…. Only then can we conquer the universe.”

Dimitry Z. Manuilsky (1949) – “War to the hilt between communism and capitalism is inevitable. Today, of course, we are not strong enough to attack…. To win we shall need the element of surprise. The bourgeoisie will have to be put to sleep. So we shall begin by launching the most spectacular peace movements on record. There will be electrifying overtures and unheard of concessions. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent, will rejoice to cooperate in their own destruction. They will leap at another chance to be friends. As soon as their guard is down, we shall smash them with our clenched fist!

Joseph Stalin – “To choose one’s victim, to prepare one’s plans minutely, to stake an implacable vengeance, and then go to bed… there is nothing sweeter in the world.”

By the way, why do you suppose that these communists always take to changing their parentally given names? Maybe they see themselves as smarter than their old fogy parents. Maybe they are enlightened, as was Lucifer. Maybe it’s like Al Gore said to a group of students: “When I was your age and the civil rights revolution was unfolding, and we kids asked our parents and their generation, ‘Explain to me again why it’s okay for the law to officially discriminate against people because of their skin color?’ And when our parents’ generation couldn’t answer that question, that’s when the law started to change. There are some things about our world that you know that older people don’t know,” he continued. “Why would that be? Well in a period of rapid change, the old assumptions sometimes just don’t work anymore because they’re out of date”. Sounds like he thinks we need some hope and change. I already have eternal hope and he can keep the change. The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Vladimir Ilich Ulyanov = Nikolai Lenin
Lev Bronstein = Leon Trotsky
Joseph Djugashvili = Joseph Stalin
Barry Soetoro = Barack Hussein Obama
Giorgi Schwartz = George Soros

The Wise Opossum

For forty years and forty nights I have been knowing, but why would a man want to know something when he could just as easily know nothing? Knowing, though sweet in the mouth, is bitter in the belly. With understanding, the ignorant bliss of the liberal is lost and is replaced with pain. Withstanding the wicked though, is always a matter of proper course. In spite of all this knowing I have obtained, at least I know enough to have continual joy. The peace of God passes all understanding and the joy of God is independent from circumstances. I pity the man who knows and yet does not know Christ as his savior. That man would be happier not knowing. In that man’s case I prescribe a bottle of whiskey and a copy of the book “Rules for Radicals” as a bed time story under a warm blanket. Maybe that will cheer him up.

Now knowing causes people to be proud and puffed up as well as sad; therefore, let us go to and learn from the opossum, lest we think more highly of ourselves than we ought to think.  If Balaam was able to learn from a donkey, being the jackass that he was, maybe we can learn something about the communists from the lowly opossum. Man, I feel so humble being educated by an opossum but I guess I had it coming. I don’t even like the way they look. I actually feel sorry for them. They’re creepy but I’m sure God made this lowly, ugly, creature just to educate us. Can you imagine looking up in class and seeing one of these creatures behind the teachers desk looking back at you? That would just chill your blood but better this than the Marxist teachers you now have. These creatures knew the art of misinformation long before the Marxists had mastered it and they didn’t even sit at the feet of Lenin, Stalin, or the New York Times. Just as the opossum plays dead when convenient to save itself from predators, so the marxist/communists have been playing dead since the fall of the Soviet Union. They have been making monkeys out of all the liberal dupes in America for many years through their disinformation marketing campaigns. Perhaps at some point I shall divulge the hidden wisdom of the monkey. They also have a lot of characteristics we could learn from but I will save that for a later date. I wonder if it is more humbling to be taught by an opossum or a monkey. I better stop. This is starting to digress.

Now consider a man by the name of Ion Pacepa who has the great misfortune of being a knower. In fact, he knows so much that he lives in hiding. His defection from the communist brotherhood was so dangerous to the communist propaganda machine that Carlos the Jackal was hired  to kill him. Do you suppose that the Jihadis ever put a fatwa on his head also?  They say you haven’t lived until you have a fatwa on your head. To digress a little more from the subject, I have a publicly vocal brother who probably has about 20 on his head. I keep a good distance from him because I’m sure his head will burst into flames at some point from all the fatwas on it. Anyway, this guy Pacepa, is a former three-star general in the Securitate, the secret police of Communist Romania, the once deputy chief of the Romanian intelligence service. You can just imagine the horror that was put in motion when this man converted out of communism and defected to the U.S..  He had the goods on everybody. Through their alliance and comradeship with the Western media outlets, the communists have spent countless dollars and millions of man hours of marketing to obfuscate and hide themselves and their intentions from the world. Having deceived the West and put them to sleep, this guy Pacepa, was fixing to blow it all for a nickel by divulging the truth. It reminds me of the time during the first presidential race with Obama. The media had spent countless dollars and time creating and spinning up an Obama that never existed. The real, radical Marxist Obama, was almost completely obscured. All was going well and then some yahoo put out a youtube video of Jeremiah Write’s (Obama’s pastor of 20 years) vitriolic Marxist sermons against America. He threatened to undermine their millions for a penny. It was nice; however, just for a while, to see the rats scurrying. Those were good times but to no avail. In the end all the lemmings succumbed to the magical marxist flute and marched off the cliff. How’s that fundamental, transformative, redistributive, hope and change working for you?

An interview with Lt. Gen. Ion Pacepa, the highest ranking Soviet bloc intel officer to ever defect
Feb. 10, 2014 9:15am Benjamin Weingarten

In a gripping interview with Blaze Books in connection with his most-recent title, “Disinformation“, the highest-ranking Soviet bloc intelligence officer to ever defect, Lt. Gen. Ion Pacepa provided his insights on a wide array of topics, from Putin’s Russia to the disinformation campaign to rebrand Pope Pius XII to “Hitler’s Pope” to the links between Leftism and anti-Semitism to the Boston bombing, and all things in-between.

Below is our interview, which was conducted via email. It has been abridged for readability. All citations are courtesy of Lt. Gen. Pacepa.

Playing devil’s advocate here, some might argue that since the Soviet Union was defeated, Americans shouldn’t care about a book on Soviet disinformation tactics. What would you say to these people?

Pacepa: The very idea that the Soviet Union was defeated is disinformation in itself. The Soviet Union changed its name and dropped its façade of Marxism, but it remained the same samoderzhaviye, the historical Russian form of autocracy in which a tsar is running the country with the help of his political police.

During the Soviet Union, the KGB was a state within the state. Now the KGB is the state. Over 6,000 former KGB officers are running Russia’s federal and local governments. The Soviet Union had one KGB officer for every 428 citizens. In 2004, Russia had one FSB officer for every 297 citizens.

During the Soviet Union, the KGB was a state within the state. Now the KGB is the state.
How would you describe today’s Russia?

Russia today is the first intelligence dictatorship in history. It is a brand new form of totalitarianism, which we are not yet familiar with. Now the KGB, rechristened FSB, is openly running Russia.

On Sept. 11, 2002, hordes of former KGB officers gathered in Moscow at the Lubyanka—the headquarters of the old and new KGB. They had not congregated to sympathize with America’s national tragedy of the previous year, but to celebrate the 125th birthday of Feliks Dzerzhinsky—the man who created the most criminal institution in contemporary history. One of my former bosses, KGB chairman Vladimir Semichastny, groused to a crowd: “I think a goal was set to destroy the KGB, to make it toothless.”[1] A few days later, Moscow’s mayor, Yury Lushkov, one of Russia’s most influential politicians, reversed himself by saying he now wanted to restore Dzerzhinsky’s statue to its place on Lubyanka Square.

It will not be easy to break Russia’s five-century-old tradition of being a police state. Nevertheless, man would not have learned to walk on the moon had he not first studied what the moon was really made of and where it lay in the universe. This is one reason we wrote “Disinformation.” Let’s hope a new generation of Russians will learn the truth, and will give that immense country a new national identity.

What would you hope is the primary takeaway for readers from your book?
Title: Disinformation: Former Spy Chief Reveals Secret Strategies for Undermining Freedom, Attacking Religion, and Promoting Terrorism

Author: Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa

Pacepa: That Marxism and its earthly Socialism are immense disinformation operations, and that all they have left behind is former Marxist countries that ended up looking like trailer camps hit by a hurricane, and leaders roasting in Dante’s Inferno. That all Marxists who have ever risen to lead a country have ended up in hell—all, from Trotsky to Stalin, Tito to Enver Hoxha to Mátyás Rakosi, Sékou Touré, Nyeree and Hugo Chavez. That all had their days of temporary glory, but that all ended in eternal disgrace. Some, like Khrushchev and Ceausescu, were even found unworthy of having their final resting place marked by any gravestone. A few remnants, like Fidel and Raul Castro, are still hanging on, but they certainly have a place in hell reserved and waiting for them.

Perhaps our book may also help President Obama abandon his craving for Marx’s utopian ideology, “to each according to his need,” which is transforming the United States into a decaying socialist country in all but name.
In your book you discuss the decades-long disinformation campaign against Pope Pius XII, who was ultimately branded (quite wrongly) by some as “Hitler’s Pope” for his actions during World War II. Can you explain why the Soviets and their allies were so concerned with smearing and discrediting him?

Pacepa: On May 8, 1945, Nazi Germany capitulated to the Allies, which now included the Soviet Union. Once denied diplomatic relations with most of the Free World, Stalin joined the exclusive victors’ club. He was (unsuccessfully) nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize and was ready to take on the world. There was, however, one more enemy he wanted to defeat: Pope Pius XII, who equated communism with Nazism and issued a “Decree against Communism” which excommunicated all Catholics who joined the Communist Party or collaborated with communist organizations.

Pius XII’s “Decree against Communism” was the largest excommunication in the history of the Catholic Church. That was unacceptable to the man who had become the Soviet Union’s only god—at whose order 168,300 Russian Orthodox clergy had been arrested during the purges of 1936–1938 alone, 100,000 of whom had been shot. Stalin could not arrest Pius XII, but he could change his past to make him look as an enemy of the new, post-World War II world.

There is a widespread belief that the worst damage from Soviet/Russian intelligence operations against the West has been the theft of highly classified secrets, such as the technology for the atom bomb. Not so. The absolutely worst—and often irreparable—damage done to the Free World has been caused by the Kremlin’s disinformation operations designed to change the past…In 1978, when I broke with communism, I left in my office safe a slip of paper on which Gen. Sakharovsky had scrawled: “Gutta cavat lapidem, non vi sed saepe cadendo.” (A drop makes a hole in a stone not by force but by constant dripping.) That Latin saying, Sakharovsky explained, encapsulated the whole concept of disinformation and framing. Lying next to it was Mao Zedong’s version: “A lie repeated a hundred times becomes the truth.”

The Kremlin’s repeated lie that Pius XII was Hitler’s Pope has become the “truth”—a lie so firmly established against all evidence to the contrary, that for most educated people who have not looked closely at the subject, there seems nothing to discuss.

You dedicated a significant part of the book to the connection between the Soviet framing of Pius XII and the current international terrorism. Could you synthesize that part here?

Pacepa: On the face of it, there may seem to be no connection between the framing of Pius XII as “Hitler’s Pope” and international terrorism. However, for someone who was sitting atop the former Soviet bloc’s intelligence pyramid at a time when both movements were born, there is a strong correlation.

Both the framing of the pope and the threat of international terrorism were born at the Lubyanka, the headquarters of the KGB. Both grew out of the Kremlin’s anti-Semitism and its addiction to framing people and countries. And both were intended to slander and undermine the faith of the Judeo-Christian world, while at the same time driving a wedge between Jews and Christians.

That brings me to the crux of the matter. Anti-Semitism has always generated terrorism.

In the wake of the Boston bombing, the Russians made a very public effort to turn over evidence they had on the Tsarnaevs’ radicalization and Russian commitment to cooperating with U.S. authorities on counter-terrorism. Do you believe there are any ulterior motives at play?

Pacepa: Absolutely. One of Putin’s main objectives since he installed himself in the Kremlin has been to reset Russia’s image as a world power. His first public success was Hillary Clinton, whose policy toward Russia was indeed called “Reset”—erroneously translated by the State Department as “Peregruzka” which means “overcharged.” Next, Putin “solved” the “mystery” of the Boston bombing. His message: If Washington had just acted on Moscow’s generous tip about the Tsarnaevs’ terrorist connection, the whole Boston tragedy would have been avoided. On Sept. 11 2013, the New York Times published an op-ed signed by Putin, in which he bitterly criticized our policy toward Syria. Soon after that, Putin took over our policy toward Syria—and in the process he saved the skin of one of his closest allies, Syrian tyrant Bashar al-Assad.

It seems that now Putin is going to also take over our foreign policy toward Egypt. The Obama administration threw President Mubarak, our most reliable Arab ally in the Middle East, under the bus, and is now further alienating Egypt by condemning its military coup that dethroned president Mohamed Morsi, who tried to transform Egypt into a fief of the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood. The Sunday Times of London predicted Putin may soon be visiting Cairo, where he “would likely get a warm, if not rapturous reception, both in government and on the street.”

One of the bombshells in your book is on the fact that the Soviets under Andropov had a dedicated plan to radicalize the Islamic world against the West generally and Israel specifically. Can you elaborate on this strategy, and in your view has it been effective?

Pacepa: In 1972, during a breakfast in his office, KGB chairman Andropov told me that “our” disinformation machinery should ignite a campaign aimed at transforming Arab anti-Semitism into an anti-American doctrine for the whole Muslim world. The idea was to portray the United States as a war-mongering, Zionist country financed by Jewish money and run by a rapacious “Council of the Elders of Zion” (the KGB’s derisive epithet for the U.S. Congress), the aim of which was to transform the rest of the world into a Jewish fiefdom. Andropov made the point that one billion adversaries could cause far greater damage than could a mere 150 million.

The KGB boss described the Muslim world as a waiting petri dish, in which we could nurture a strain of hate-America. The Muslims had a taste for nationalism, jingoism and victimology. We had only to keep repeating, over and over, that the United States was a war-mongering, Zionist country financed by Jewish money, with the goal of taking over the whole world.

The KGB community threw millions of dollars and thousands of people into that gigantic project, as described in our book.

…The grisly decapitation and dismembering of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in 2002 symbolizes Andropov’s legacy. The mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, gruesomely mur­dered Pearl because he was an American Jew. The Kremlin’s continued silence about the framing of Pius XII, who was politically decapitated in part because he had protected the Jews, symbolizes another Andropov legacy.

Given the spread of progressivism and dominance of cultural Marxism in the West, did the West win the Cold War?

Pacepa: The Cold War is indeed over, but, unlike other wars, that one did not end with the defeated enemy throwing down his weapons. In spite of the press coverage given to its nuclear competition, the Cold War was in fact waged primarily for the purpose of conquering minds, and it seems that the loser’s mindset cannot be changed from one day to the next…

The Cold War was in fact waged primarily for the purpose of conquering minds
Is it too far-fetched to suggest that this post-Cold War Russia calls up the hypothetical image of a postwar Germany being run by former Gestapo officers, who reinstate Hitler’s “Deutschland Über Alles” as national anthem, call the demise of Nazi Germany a “national tragedy on an enormous scale,” and invade a neighboring country, perhaps Poland, the way Hitler set off World War II?

You discuss in your book the fact that the word glasnost was perverted from its original meaning. Can you elaborate on this?

Pacepa: All of the Western media and most of the Western “experts,” even in intelligence and defense establishments, believe that Gorbachev invented the word glasnost to describe his proclaimed effort to lead the Soviet Union “out of its totalitarian state and to democracy, to freedom, to openness.” So does the committee that gave Gorbachev the Nobel Peace Prize. The venerable Encyclopedia Britannica defines glasnost as: “Soviet policy of open discussion of political and social issues. It was instituted by Mikhail Gorbachev in the late 1980s and began the democratization of the Soviet Union.”[2] Merriam-Webster agrees.[3] And the American Heritage Dictionary defines Gorbachev’s glasnost as “an official policy of the former Soviet government emphasizing candor with regard to discussion of social problems and shortcomings.”[4]

Glasnost was a[n]…instrument…to embellish the stature of a leader, not a catchword for openness
But for those of us who once led the Soviet bloc intelligence community, glasnost was a dezinformatsiya instrument used to embellish the stature of a leader, not a catchword for openness, as it has lately become known to the rest of the world. Glasnost was not invented by Gorbachev and it does not mean openness. Glasnost is an old Russian term for polishing the ruler’s image.

In the mid 1930s—half a century before Gorbachev’s glasnost—the official Soviet encyclopedia defined the word glasnost as a spin on news released to the public: “Dostupnost obshchestvennomy obsuzhdeniyu, kontrolyu; publichnost,” meaning, the quality of being made available for public discussion or control.[5] In other words, glasnost meant, literally, publicizing, i.e., self-promotion.

Since the 16th century’s Ivan the Terrible, all that country’s leaders have used glasnost to promote themselves inside and outside the country. [Goes on to describe history, and picks up in the 1950s]

…At that time, I was already a Soviet bloc intelligence officer. I was, however, not yet aware that a Marxist tyrant’s image was so important that the despot would go to any lengths, even to the point of killing and imprisoning millions, rewriting history, manipulating religion, destroying institutions, and changing traditions, all in an effort to beatify himself—or to demonize his competitors and enemies.

You mention in your book that the KGB had significantly more agents dedicated to penetrating Western institutions and propagandizing therein, than it had traditional intelligence-gathering agents. Why were KGB resources allocated this way?

During the Cold War, disinformation and glasnost were a lot more important…than stealing secrets.
Pacepa: During the Cold War, disinformation and glasnost were a lot more important for the KGB community than stealing secrets. Sakharovsky used to preach that, to use a mundane figure of speech, one might compare old-fashioned, classical espionage with a pickpocket’s snatch. If the deed was discovered, the result would be painful but normally not life-threatening for the victim; however, most of the time it would not even be noticed. Classical espionage, like picking pockets, was an accumulation of one-time thefts. Our disinformation and glasnost techniques, on the other hand, were a continuous process, conceived to invade people’s minds and consciences and there to put down roots. That was the future. That was going to open up a whole new era in the history of communist foreign intelligence.

In your book you described the KGB’s Operation “Ares.” Let’s talk about it.

Pacepa: …Andropov was convinced that the war in Vietnam provided a once-in-a-lifetime chance to make Europe fear America’s military terror and instill discord between the Old Continent and its own leader at that time, the United States.

Operation “Ares” started in 1965, when the KGB transformed the vitriolic anti-American international Conference on Vietnam into an international organization, colloquially called the Stockholm Conference, and staffed it with undercover officers of the Soviet bloc foreign intelligence services—including the DIE. The Stockholm Conference also received an average of 15 million dollars yearly, delivered by the KGB in the form of laundered cash dollars in order to hide their origin.[6]

[T]he anti-Vietnam…protesters…came to regard their own government, not communism, as the enemy
Our book details this KGB disinformation operation. Here I will only note that “Ares” did indeed change the United States, just as Andropov predicted. By 1968, the anti-Vietnam War protesters in the U.S. numbered almost seven million. They came to regard their own government, not communism, as the enemy.[7]

In 1972, I had a long discussion with Andropov about this operation in his dark, cavernous KGB office, which breathed secrecy from every inch of its thick walls, just as his “Ares” did. “Our ‘Ares’ turned America against her own government,” Andropov started off in his soft voice. It damaged America’s foreign policy consensus, poisoned her domestic debate, and built a credibility gap between America and European public opinion that was wide and deep. Now all we had to do was to continue planting the seeds of “Ares” and water them day after day after day. Eventually, American leftists would seize upon our “Ares” and would start pursuing it of their own accord. In the end, our original involvement would be forgotten, and “Ares” would take on a life of its own. That was how human nature worked, Andropov explained. Our “Ares” would change America forever.

…How did our venerable American sense of patriotism arrive at this point? [i.e. anti-war sentiment in Democratic Party during the GW Bush Administration]

…Sen. Joseph Lieberman said, explaining the problem in a nutshell on May 27, 2008. “Now, the Democratic Party sees America as the main danger to the world’s peace. The Soviets and their allies were our enemies not because they were inspired by a totalitarian ideology fundamentally hostile to our way of life, or because they nursed ambitions of global conquest. Rather, the Soviets were our enemies because we had provoked them, and because we failed to sit down and accord them the respect they deserved. In other words, the Cold War was mostly America’s fault.”[8]

Sen. Lieberman was right on the money, but he knew only one side of the coin. The huge KGB disinformation and glasnost effort is the other side.

During the Cold War, more people in the Soviet bloc worked for various “Ares” operations than for the Soviet army and defense industry put together. The bloc’s intelligence community alone had well over one million officers and several million informants around the world. All were involved in deceiving the West—and their own people—or in supporting this effort. To them should be added the vast number of people working for the international disinformation organizations that the KGB secretly created.

In your view what is the best way to fight against Leftist disinformation?

Pacepa: By revealing the truth…Your Blaze and Glenn Beck’s tremendous power of persuasion could change night into day. Together you could also persuade the American public, administration and Congress to take another look at President Truman’s NSC 68/1950.

That National Security Council report did not blame videos or books for the Cold War’s ideological and terrorist attacks against the United States. That down-to-earth, 58-page document described the challenges facing the United States in realistic terms. “The issues that face us are momentous,” NSC 68/1950 stated, “involving the fulfillment or destruction not only of this Republic but of civilization itself.”[9]

Therefore, NSC 68/1950 contained a two-pronged political strategy: superior military power and a “Campaign of Truth,” defined as “a struggle, above all else, for the minds of men.” Truman argued that the propaganda used by the “forces of imperialistic communism” could be overcome only by the “plain, simple, unvarnished truth.”[10] The Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and Radio Liberation (soon to become Radio Liberty) became part of Truman’s “Campaign of Truth.”[11]

Romania’s second post-communist president, Emil Constantinescu, summed it all up:

Radio Free Europe has been a lot more important than the armies and the most sophisticated missiles. The ‘missiles’ that destroyed Communism were launched from Radio Free Europe, and this was Washington’s most important investment during the Cold War. I don’t know whether the Americans themselves realize this now, seven years after the fall of Communism, but we understand it perfectly well.[12]

You talk at length about the anti-Semitism that underpinned and animated much of the Leftist attack on the West, including in the media through plays such as “The Deputy.” Why is it that Leftism and Jew-hatred have gone hand in hand?

Pacepa: Most leftists are totalitarians, and totalitarianism (what we now innocuously call the “nanny state”) always requires a tangible enemy. The Jews, who were not protected by the power of a state, proved a convenient enemy for both leftist and rightist totalitarians…

[After describing history of anti-Semitic ideas] These anti-Semitic ideas were soon embodied in one of the most resilient pieces of disinformation in history: the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, forged by Tsar Alexander III’s political police, the Okhrana.[13] To disguise its hand, the Okhrana claimed it to be the minutes of the first Zionist Congress (1897 in Basel, Switzerland), at which the Jews had allegedly plotted to take over the world. The Protocols was compiled by the Okhrana to compromise the new generation of Jewish intellectuals who wanted to modernize the country.

The author of the Protocols was Petr Ivanovich Rachovsky, an Okhrana disinformation expert assigned to France, who had been inspired by the wave of anti-Semitism aroused by the Dreyfus controversy.[14] Rachovsky lifted most of his text from an obscure 1864 French satire called Dialogue aux Enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu (“Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu”), written by Maurice Joly and accusing Emperor Napoleon III of plotting to seize all the powers in French society.

I once saw both original documents in the KGB archive. Rachovsky had done nothing more than substitute the words the world for France and the Jews for Napoleon III. In 1921, the Times of London published a devastating exposure of the forgery by printing extracts from the Protocols side-by-side with the passages from the Joly book that had been plagiarized.[15] Yet that did not stop the Protocols from becoming the basis for much of Hitler’s anti-Semitic philosophy as expressed in Mein Kampf, written in 1923.

[Regarding a disinformation campaign beginning in 1959]…“We planted the seeds of anti-Semitism in Germany, and only we can revive them,” Khrushchev explained. The code name of his operation was “Zarathustra,” to symbolize that anti-Semitism was as immortal in the German mind as was German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche’s aphoristic book Also Sprach Zarathustra (“Thus Spake Zarathustra”) in German literature. The task was to “discreetly” disseminate copies of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion throughout West Germany and the rest of Western Europe. During the almost two decades that I continued to remain in Romania, our intelligence community disseminated several million Protocols—translated into German, English, French and Arabic—to leftist organizations around the world, to mosques, and to countless people whose names were randomly selected from telephone books.

We do not have an instrument that can scientifically measure the results of disinformation operations. But it is safe to presume that the combined effect of spreading millions of Protocols around the world and portraying the United States as a Zionist instrument used to subjugate the world to Jewish interests played a role in generating the shameful anti-Americanism costumed in the robes of anti-Semitism that we are facing today.

“Lion of the Senate”?

Fellow democrats referred to the late Senator Kennedy as the “Lion of the Senate”. This is the usual false portrayal fellow communists give to their comrades, lest the public should become aware of who they really are. By referring to him this way, they disrespect this noble creature. When it kills, it makes no apology and has no remorse. It is what it is and is exactly what it is supposed to be. Kennedy; on the other hand, is exactly the opposite of how the liberal media portrays him and exactly the opposite of how he ought to have been. He murdered millions through abortion and called it “a women’s choice”. He stole untold wealth from the public and called it compassion, as if he were redistributing his own money and not that of others. He voted for every communist cause that ever came down the pike and yet called himself a patriotic American. He was a renowned womanizer, like his brother and father, cheating on his spouse and yet was portrayed as a moral man by the leftist media. If you can think of any other heinous behaviors that are common to man, a quick study of history will reveal that it abounded in this man. There was no fear of God before his eyes. Remember, communism is an ideology that uses euphemisms to hide their true intentions. If they came right out and said who they are and what they believed, people would either run away or string them up by the neck post haste. Being fully aware of this, they hide in the shadows and use code words that have a 180 degree different meaning to the insiders than they do to the public dupes. They present themselves as angels of light but are whited sepulchers. “Hope” = Despair under communism for a good future, “Change” = Devolving to tyranny, “Forward” = Backward to a failed ideology, “Workers of the World Unite” = Overthrow of law,order, and of society itself. “Yes We Can” = Yes we can change human nature from what God created us to be into what we as communists think it should be (example: women are the same as men). “Social Justice” = Communism/Redistribution of wealth (does that sound like justice to you?). The communists have been using these same buzz words all around the world for decades, from the middle east, through the Far East, to Central America, to America. “The end justifies the means” in all their efforts to foment the overthrow of governments all over the world. Unsurprisingly, this formula has been very successful because of the desperately wicked condition of the heart of man. Jer.17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?

Of an absolute truth, Kennedy was a Lion for the goals of the international one world communists. I suppose he thought he would profit himself by so being. How short sighted. “For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?” and where now are the multiple millions of dollars that this man possessed? and do those who now have his money consider God? They will be gone soon as well. Do they consider this?
Psalm 50
1 A Psalm of Asaph. The mighty God, even the LORD, hath spoken, and called the earth from the rising of the sun unto the going down thereof.
2 Out of Zion, the perfection of beauty, God hath shined.
3 Our God shall come, and shall not keep silence: a fire shall devour before him, and it shall be very tempestuous round about him.
4 He shall call to the heavens from above, and to the earth, that he may judge his people.
5 Gather my saints together unto me; those that have made a covenant with me by sacrifice.
6 And the heavens shall declare his righteousness: for God is judge himself. Selah.
7 Hear, O my people, and I will speak; O Israel, and I will testify against thee: I am God, even thy God.
8 I will not reprove thee for thy sacrifices or thy burnt offerings, to have been continually before me.
9 I will take no bullock out of thy house, nor he goats out of thy folds.
10 For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills.
11 I know all the fowls of the mountains: and the wild beasts of the field are mine.
12 If I were hungry, I would not tell thee: for the world is mine, and the fulness thereof.
13 Will I eat the flesh of bulls, or drink the blood of goats?
14 Offer unto God thanksgiving; and pay thy vows unto the most High:
15 And call upon me in the day of trouble: I will deliver thee, and thou shalt glorify me.
16 But unto the wicked God saith, What hast thou to do to declare my statutes, or that thou shouldest take my covenant in thy mouth?
17 Seeing thou hatest instruction, and castest my words behind thee.
18 When thou sawest a thief, then thou consentedst with him, and hast been partaker with adulterers.
19 Thou givest thy mouth to evil, and thy tongue frameth deceit.
20 Thou sittest and speakest against thy brother; thou slanderest thine own mother’s son.
21 These things hast thou done, and I kept silence; thou thoughtest that I was altogether such an one as thyself: but I will reprove thee, and set them in order before thine eyes.
22 Now consider this, ye that forget God, lest I tear you in pieces, and there be none to deliver.
23 Whoso offereth praise glorifieth me: and to him that ordereth his conversation aright will I shew the salvation of God.

Consider reading this article found in THE BLAZE (do these democrats have no shame?):

The outrage over the letter sent by 47 U.S. senators to Iran’s leaders has been called everything from “unprecedented” to “treasonous.”

But is it treason? Is it unprecedented?

Based on a story first published in 1991, the letter organized by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and signed by 46 Senate colleagues does not mark the first time an elected official has reached out to a foreign government involved in sensitive nuclear negotiations with a U.S. president.

In 1983, the late Sen. Ted Kennedy concocted a scheme meant not only to undermine President Ronald Reagan’s nuclear arms reduction talks with the Soviet Union, but to propel the senator into the catbird seat for the 1988 presidential election.

The Kennedy plan was only revealed after a treasure trove of documents from the dissolved Soviet empire was released. London Times reporter Tim Sebastian brought the story to the world in 1991, revealing a memo from then-KGB head Viktor Chebrikov to the Soviet leader, Yuri Andropov.

In the note, Chebrikov detailed Kennedy’s plan, presented in person, by former U.S. senator and close Kennedy friend, John Tunney. (Kennedy was the best man at Tunney’s 1977 wedding.)

Chebrikov’s account of two days in May 1983 included Tunney detailing a series of steps that would undermine Reagan’s negotiations with the Soviet leader while strengthening Kennedy’s position and making Democrats look like they were leading the push for a peaceful world, free of fear of a nuclear war between the U.S. and the Soviets.

The story didn’t receive too much attention until Peter Robinson’s opinion piece was carried in the New York Post and Forbes online in 2009.

Image: NY Post
Image source: New York Post
The Chebrikov memo stated that Kennedy is “very troubled by the current state of Soviet-American relations.” It added, “The main reason for this is Reagan’s belligerence, and his firm commitment to deploy new American middle range nuclear weapons within Western Europe.”

The memo went on:

According to Kennedy, the current threat is due to the President’s refusal to engage any modification on his politics. He feels that his domestic standing has been strengthened because of the well publicized improvement of the economy: inflation has been greatly reduced, production levels are increasing as is overall business activity. For these reasons, interest rates will continue to decline. The White House has portrayed this in the media as the “success of Reaganomics.”

The KGB leader noted that an economic slide in America could help the Democrats’ chances in the upcoming election:

A few well known economists and members of financial circles, particularly from the north-eastern states, foresee certain hidden tendencies that may bring about a new economic crisis in the USA. This could bring about the fall of the presidential campaign of 1984, which would benefit the Democratic party.

The Chebrikov memo also laid out a two-step proposal from Kennedy, presented by Tunney, to the Soviet leadership:

1. Kennedy asks Y.V. Andropov to consider inviting the senator to Moscow for a personal meeting in July of this year. The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA. He would also like to inform you that he has planned a trip through Western Europe, where he anticipates meeting England’s Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and French President Mitterand in which he will exchange similar ideas regarding the same issues.

In addition to the invitation from Andropov, Kennedy pledged to bring Republican Sen. Mark Hatfield, Kennedy’s partner on a 1982 proposed nuclear freeze between the U.S. and the USSR.

The second step in Kennedy’s plan involved bringing Andropov to the United States to speak directly to the American people:

2. Kennedy believes that in order to influence Americans it would be important to organize in August-September of this year, televised interviews with Y.V. Andropov in the USA. A direct appeal by the General Secretary to the American people will, without a doubt, attract a great deal of attention and interest in the country. The senator is convinced this would receive the maximum resonance in so far as television is the most effective method of mass media and information.

Kennedy pledged to make certain the biggest names in American television news would also air interviews with the Soviet leader, mentioning “television columnists Walter Cronkite or Barbara Walters could visit Moscow.”

The Kennedy proposal also included Tunney’s indication that Kennedy’s presidential aspirations were indeed real:

Tunney remarked that the senator wants to run for president in 1988. At that time, he will be 56 and his personal problems, which could hinder his standing, will be resolved (Kennedy has just completed a divorce and plans to remarry in the near future).

The proposal was apparently never seriously considered by Yuri Andropov; part of the reason it may have been ignored was the Soviet leader’s rapidly deteriorating health. Three months before Tunney took Kennedy’s plan to Moscow, Andropov reportedly experienced total renal failure. He was hospitalized in August 1983 and died in February 1984.

The entire memo appeared in Paul Kengor’s book, “The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism.” According to Kengor, its validity has not been questioned. Forbes quoted Kengor on the memo: ”I scrutinized it more carefully than anything I’ve ever dealt with as a scholar” and “I showed the document to numerous authorities who deal with Soviet archival material…No one has debunked the memorandum or shown it to be a forgery.”

Additionally, Kengor said, “Kennedy’s office did not deny it.”

But Ted Kennedy’s back-channel pitch to the Soviets isn’t the only such instance that shows Senate Republicans are not blazing entirely new ground. In 1984, 10 Democrats wrote a “Dear Commandante” letter to Nicaraguan leader Daniel Noriega. Rep. Newt Gingrich called this action “at best, unwise, at worst, illegal.”

And in 2007 — one year before Barack Obama was elected president — then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi paid a visit to a foreign leader against the wishes of President George W. Bush — to Syrian dictator Bashar Assad.

If you would like to read the entire letter go here:

MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction)

During the cold war environment days there existed the doctrine of “MAD” between the Soviet Union and the United States. This doctrine stated that if either nation was to launch nuclear missiles at the one, the one would retaliate in kind, thus both nations being destroyed. This concept was supposed to keep both nations from attacking each other and seems to have worked well up until now. As long as both nations have plenty of nuclear missiles it will prevent the other one from making a preliminary strike. In the event that the United States continues to deplete its nuclear stock pile, while the Russians continue to increase theirs, this country will be at increased risk of attack. This is one reason it is so dangerous to have communists running your government. They see the Russian government as a benign entity with like ideology to their own. Their jaded view of the Soviets puts us all at peril.

Now consider the threat of Mutual Assured Economic Detruction. If the economies of Greece and/or other European nations fail, due to their continued laziness and their spending of more than they make, this will cascade, causing the failure of other nations economies who are holding the Greek’s dept. All of these European nations economies are tied together with a single currency, the Euro. The U.S. will also be dragged into this collapse seeing we are also tied economically to them. The U.S. has already exchanged more valuable dollars for less valuable Euros in the recent past. Of course these were printed dollars but it devalues the exiting dollars already in circulation.

Keep your eye on the “Troika”. The longer you kick the can down the road, propping up the perpetrators, and refuse to deal with the underling cause of the problem, the greater the fall will be when it finally comes. Every time they bail out the Greeks someone else has to pay for it (primarily Germany). They cannot allow them to continue to grossly overspend what they don’t have but they also cannot allow them to collapse or they will be dragged down with them. This is why the Troika keeps renegotiating their national dept.

Now I think we should all hold hands and sing the communist dupe Ian Gillan’s song “Mutually Assured Destruction”.

From where I stand
I see a blind man on a hill
From where I stand
I see the teacher in the valley
From where I stand
I see the blind man on a hill
And he is standing very still
The way it’s planned
They’ll only let the fools survive
The way it’s planned
You would not want to stay alive
Just one big band
It’s all they’re leaving you to think about
From where I stand
I know just what they’re planning
I know they’re planning one big bang
And they call it Mutually Assured Destruction
From where I stand
I can see the mushrooms in the sky
From where I stand
I can watch the bleeding children cry
And they will die
And you who have no wings will fly
From where I stand
I see the man on the hill
And he is standing very still

Excerpt from “THE COMMUNIST, Frank Marshall Davis: The untold story of Barack Obama’s mentor”

I thought I would redistribute a little bit of Paul Kengor’s book, “THE COMMUNIST, Frank Marshall Davis: The Untold Story Of Barack Obama’s Mentor”, to my own treasure trove of writings, without his consent. Since I am constantly being taxed of my property and himself accused of being a possible Kulak, it seemed only fair that he should be taxed as well. Though he spent thousands of hours researching and writing this book, that does not entitle him to keep all of the proceeds from it’s sales. Also, the contents of the book should belong to the state so that we can all profit from his work. I feel that I should tax him of his labor for myself. As my old friend Carl Marx put it “from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs”. It seemed to me that he had not paid or received his fair share in forced plagiarizm. For this reason, I have taken this excerpt from his book. I suggest that anyone with some interest in the subject of Obama’s ideology should read this book. Though Obama and his handlers have taken great pains to obscure themselves, Mr. Kengor has ferreted them out to some degree. They dwell in the shadows because as Jesus said: “And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved”. Go to the pdf link to read an interesting excerpt from the book. It is very well researched by the author.

Hope and Change?

Dietrich Bonhoeffer — ‘Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.’


Through the Soviet infiltration of every institution in America, from the churches to the supreme court, from the press to the legislative bodies, from the public schools to the universities, America has accepted the institution of abortion along with many other miscreant behaviors and thoughts. The crime of abortion has taken the lives of many more people that Hitler did. This innocent blood that has been shed will require a recompense. Only God knows when and how. You do not want to be in the way of this when it comes. These behaviors were instituted and encouraged by these communist subversives because they knew that this would undermine their great enemy America. World domination is and has always been their goal and America has always stood in the way. These insurgents don’t allow, for example, sodomy in their own country but have sold it on America because they knew it would undermine us. They don’t allow homosexuals to marry in Russia but legislate it here through their proxies to be legal. They also push pornography here for the same reasons. For a further understanding of Soviet goals in America please google the 1963 goals of the Soviets in America. The list is too long for me to reiterate here.

While America fights the Jihadis and other enemies around the world the enemy is already within our gates. The muslim brotherhood operates freely from within the walls of our country. They advise our law enforcement on a federal level how to deal with their own jihadi operatives. This is the fox guarding the hen house. While we chase foreign enemies we have a communist commander and chief. You could not write a novel as good as the reality. The democratic party is almost entirely communist thanks to their intense and energetic efforts to take it over. They also own much of the republican party from where they offer a communist light alternative to the democrats.

Good grief, I think I am starting to sound like a mad man! Do you think if I close my eyes really tight and concentrate very hard that I might also experience not knowing anything and could experience some of that Liberal bliss? Maybe it’s too late for me and I’m ruined for this world.

Isaiah 2

1 The word that Isaiah the son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem.
2 And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the LORD’S house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it.
3 And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem.
4 And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.
5 O house of Jacob, come ye, and let us walk in the light of the LORD.
6 Therefore thou hast forsaken thy people the house of Jacob, because they be replenished from the east, and are soothsayers like the Philistines, and they please themselves in the children of strangers.
7 Their land also is full of silver and gold, neither is there any end of their treasures; their land is also full of horses, neither is there any end of their chariots:
8 Their land also is full of idols; they worship the work of their own hands, that which their own fingers have made:
9 And the mean man boweth down, and the great man humbleth himself: therefore forgive them not.
10 Enter into the rock, and hide thee in the dust, for fear of the LORD, and for the glory of his majesty.
11 The lofty looks of man shall be humbled, and the haughtiness of men shall be bowed down, and the LORD alone shall be exalted in that day.
12 For the day of the LORD of hosts shall be upon every one that is proud and lofty, and upon every one that is lifted up; and he shall be brought low:
13 And upon all the cedars of Lebanon, that are high and lifted up, and upon all the oaks of Bashan,
14 And upon all the high mountains, and upon all the hills that are lifted up,
15 And upon every high tower, and upon every fenced wall,
16 And upon all the ships of Tarshish, and upon all pleasant pictures.
17 And the loftiness of man shall be bowed down, and the haughtiness of men shall be made low: and the LORD alone shall be exalted in that day.
18 And the idols he shall utterly abolish.
19 And they shall go into the holes of the rocks, and into the caves of the earth, for fear of the LORD, and for the glory of his majesty, when he ariseth to shake terribly the earth.
20 In that day a man shall cast his idols of silver, and his idols of gold, which they made each one for himself to worship, to the moles and to the bats;
21 To go into the clefts of the rocks, and into the tops of the ragged rocks, for fear of the LORD, and for the glory of his majesty, when he ariseth to shake terribly the earth.
22 Cease ye from man, whose breath is in his nostrils: for wherein is he to be accounted of?

The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree

Consider a partial list of attributes that Paul Kengor lists in his well researched book “The Communist” about Frank Marshall Davis. Frank was a rabid communist who worked for and at the direction of the Russian Soviet comintern. His USA communist party member number was 47544. He wrote incessantly for various communist publications. Frank Marshall Davis (1905-87) was a mentor to a young Barack Obama throughout the 1970s, the period of Obama’s adolescence.

* rejected and blasted Winston Churchill

*vilified and targeted General Motors, a company that he would have been thrilled to nationalize

*advocated wealth redistribution from (in his words) greedy “corporations” to “health insurance” and “public works projects”

*favored taxpayer funding of universal health care

*supported government stimulus and trumpeted the public sector over the private sector

*constantly bashed Wall Street

*marched in May Day parades

*dismissed traditional notions of American exceptionalism and framed America not as selflessly servicing the post-World War    II world but instead as selfishly flaunting its so-call “mountainous ego” and “racist-imperiallist-colonialist” ambitions

*warned God-and-gun-clinging Americans about huckster preachers and instead sought the political support of the “social  justice” Religious Left for various causes and campaigns

*perceived the Catholic church as an obstacle to his vision for the state

*confidently declared certain government actions “constitutional” or “unconstitutional”

*excoriated the “tentacles of big business,” bankers, big oil, the “Big Boys” “excess profits,” corporate fat cats and their “fat contracts,” “millionaires” and “rich men,”and the wealthy

*attacked “GOP” tax cuts that “spare the rich” and that only “benefit millionaires”

*singled out the “corporate executive” for not paying his “fair” share

*used slogans such and “change” and “forward”

It is amazing that these men attack the very country that allows them to voice their opinions even when they are wrong, and yet they hate and hinder your free speech. They would have been killed by the KGB if they had voiced any dissent in their beloved USSR. Instead of them both being so very wealthy, they would have been barley able to feed themselves if they had lived in Russia and yet, they want to redistribute any wealth you have worked to attain. Instead of being free to prosper as negros they would have been persecuted in Russia for their color and race. At the end of the day they love tyranny as long as they are the ones on top. If they are not on top they cry foul. They say they love democracy and yet labor to commit vast voter fraud through illegal immigration and other means such as false ballots, voter intimidation, etc. They claim to be bearers of the truth and yet they lie so incessantly that one cannot even take their good mornings or a thank you as sincere. Even that is designed to manipulate others for their end goals. Again, as with all communists, “the end justifies the means”.

Theft equals fair?

One of the fundamental tenants of communism is the redistribution of wealth. Carl Marx stated “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” This redistribution of wealth is always a one way street and never voluntary. It is never their money being redistributed but always the other guys. Their wealth and power always continues to grow. It is sold as charity and fairness. They take from the few and give to the many to buy the support of the many, while losing only the support of the few.  It translates as: I’m taking your property for my benefit; in other words, stealing your property. As Obama puts it “paying your fair share.” So somehow, while stealing your property (your money is your property), they claim they are being fair. Since when is stealing fair? Remember, in order to understand the meaning of what communists/liberals/progressives are saying you have to rotate the words 180 degrees. The first communist and the father of lies, Lucifer, created the necessity for the 180 degree translation twist. God said “But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” “The serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” To bad for them and us that they did not know how to do the 180 translation twist. If they had just known how to spin the devil’s words around 180 degrees we would never have been in all this trouble. Before this time there was no need for this type of translation because the lie had not yet been invented.

Now consider the words of Jesus: “For the kingdom of heaven is as a man travelling into a far country, who called his own servants, and delivered unto them his goods. And unto one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one; to every man according to his several ability; and straightway took his journey. Then he that had received the five talents went and traded with the same, and made them other five talents. And likewise he that had received two, he also gained other two. But he that had received one went and digged in the earth, and hid his lord’s money. After a long time the lord of those servants cometh, and reckoneth with them. And so he that had received five talents came and brought other five talents, saying, Lord, thou deliveredst unto me five talents: behold, I have gained beside them five talents more. His lord said unto him, Well done, thou good and faithful servant: thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord. He also that had received two talents came and said, Lord, thou deliveredst unto me two talents: behold, I have gained two other talents beside them. His lord said unto him, Well done, good and faithful servant; thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord. Then he which had received the one talent came and said, Lord, I knew thee that thou art an hard man, reaping where thou hast not sown, and gathering where thou hast not strewed: And I was afraid, and went and hid thy talent in the earth: lo, there thou hast that is thine. His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed: Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury. Take therefore the talent from him, and give it unto him which hath ten talents. For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath. And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” You don’t suppose the Lord was one of those “fat cats” that Obama and other communists have belittled do you? Why would He take the talent from the guy that only had one and give it to the guy who had ten already? Shouldn’t he have at least given it to the guy who only had two? Why should the guy who already has ten talents be given one more and then have abundance above the rest? This just doesn’t seem fair. Did the Lord not know the words of Carl Marx?

Now consider this lest your money perish with you: If a man gives his property (money, etc.) from his own free will, not coercion, to someone in need because of his faith in Jesus and love for God, he shall receive a reward from his maker. If someone takes another’s money and gives it to someone else in order to gain a profit in some way for himself, he is a thief, and shall add to his eternal torment.

A quote from John Adams states that “The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the law of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.”

Obama, like his beloved mentor Frank Marshall Davis, utterly despised Winston Churchill. His disdain went to the point that he removed the bust of Churchill that was in the oval office and had it sent back to Britain. The reason they hated Churchill so much can perhaps be summed up in this one quote from Churchill: “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”