Lying by telling the truth?

If a pastor speaks no more than 95% of the truth he may be able to keep most of his congregation but he must avoid 50% of all pertinent topics if he plans on keeping his job. If he becomes too bold and speaks on all pertinent topics along with 100% truthfulness he may very well end up like Jesus did. Sometimes its not what you say thats wrong but what right things you don’t say that sends the wrong message. In this case it is even possible to spread a lie by speaking the truth. Even the devil sometimes speaks the truth in order to perpetrate a lie (Matt. 4:6 And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.)

Jesus would oftenly answer a persons question by answering a different question than the questioner asked.

John 6:66 From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him. 6:67 Then said Jesus unto the twelve, Will ye also go away?

Jesus was not asking for a show of hands as to who approved of what he was saying. The truth makes no apologies. He knew where he came from and where he was going. If the twelve had left, his destiny would not have changed, only theirs would have changed.

Paul spoke to the elders of Ephesus and upon telling them they would not see his face again he declared the following:

20:26 Wherefore I take you to record this day, that I am pure from the blood of all men
20:27 For I have not shunned to declare unto you all the counsel of God.

Maybe the problem is not that the church is not growing fast enough but that there are too many people in the church. The goal of some churches is to fill all the seats and grow as much as possible. Maybe the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth needs to be preached and let the chips fall where they may. If the church grows under these conditions then God is behind it and doing it. Maybe there are too many christians. Does take up your cross and dying to yourself sound like the kind of message people should want to here? I think not. Perhaps the full truth of God would cure the problem. Nothing like a strong light to send the roaches scurrying.

A few facts about Hillary Clinton in case you thought it was a good idea to vote for her in 2016

It is vitally important that any person filling the office of the President of the United States be a person of character. They must be an honest person full of the characteristics of Christ. They must be willing to do the right things even to their own hurt if necessary. The attitude of their heart must be that of a servant, serving the country according to the will of God.

Hillary Clinton is a perfect example of what any leader cannot be. This vile women, along with her husband Ahab, is full to the brim with every evil, demonic characteristics. She has a long history of communism that started with her introduction to Saul Alinsky in her college days. He was a very vocal, Jewish communist that wrote the book “rules for radicals” and dedicated his book to Lucifer. This book is studied, followed, and admired by the leftists both of Hillaries time and today. He became the mentor and idol that she wrote her thesis on. I plan to write further on this subject in the coming days. Like so many who came before her she is always at odds with the Lord. They all come and they all go but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.

Hilary Clinton and the State Department refused to place Boko Haram on the list of foreign terrorist organizations in 2011, after the group bombed the UN headquarters in Abuja. The refusal came despite the urging of the Justice Department, the FBI, the CIA, and over a dozen Senators and Congressmen.[61]

In 2014 Boko Haram kidnapped 276 Black African Christian girls and has sold them into slavery, reports indicate.

She criticized the foreign minister of the United Arab Emirates for sending troops to quash protests in Bahrain even as she pressed him to send planes to intervene in Libya. She was the driving force behind the United States military action in Libya (It is said on March 14 she met in Paris with members of the Libyan jihadis and Bernard Henri Levy). Mrs. Clinton was one of a handful of top administration aides who had been arguing for intervention.

On March 17, in Tunisia, Hillary said: “Gaddafi must go,” calling him “a ruthless dictator that has no conscience and will destroy anyone or anything in his way.”(does this sound like anyone else you know?) “If Gaddafi does not go, he will just make trouble,” she said. “That is just his nature. There are some creatures that are like that.” [6]

“ We are currently doing everything we can to bomb, strafe and use missiles to carry the rebels into power in Libya. We want them to win. We just don’t know who they are.” Hillary Rodham Clinton. [8] ”

The president fully articulated American foreign policy toward Libya as formulated by Hillary Clinton: “Left unchecked… a humanitarian crisis would ensue…. The democratic values that we stand for would be overrun.”[55] Nonetheless, after being captured on October 20, 2011 by forces backed by Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration, Gaddafi was first brutally sodomized, murdered, and his lifeless body paraded through the streets.[56]
On September 11, 2012, the anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks, Islamist terrorists attacked the American embassy and killed four people. In testimony before Congress on January the 23th, 2013 Clinton was asked why the Obama administration deliberately put out false information about the attack just prior to the Presidential Election of 2012, Clinton screamed at Senators, “WHAT DIFFERENCE AT THIS POINT DOES IT MAKE?”.[57]

Hillary received a “Pants on Fire” award from PolitiFact for saying Obama “basically threatened to bomb Pakistan.”[48] Hillary received a second “Pants on Fire” award from PolitiFact for this false statement to a Washington, D.C. crowd on March 17th, 2008.
“ I remember landing under sniper fire.[49] ”. Peggy Noonan observed Hillary Clinton’s distortions of her record on the campaign trail:
She is having the worst case of cognitive dissonance in the history of modern politics. She cannot come up with a credible, realistic path to the nomination. … But she is a scrapper, a fighter, and she’s doing what she knows how to do: scrap and fight. Only harder. So that she ups the ante every day. She helped Ireland achieve peace. She tried to stop NAFTA. She’s been a leader for 35 years. She landed in Bosnia under siege and bravely dodged bullets. It was as if she’d watched the movie Wag the Dog, with its fake footage of a terrified refugee woman running frantically from mortar fire, and found it not a cautionary tale about manipulation and politics, but an inspiration.

Hillary Clinton was chastised by a Catholic Advocacy group for using an image of Mother Teresa in a campaign ad. Clinton continues to support abortion. [43] The U.S. Catholic-based advocacy group Fidelis, an organization working with people of faith to defend the sanctity of life, traditional marriage, and religious liberty rights, called for Hillary Clinton to remove the image of Mother Teresa from their campaign video. In a press release the group declared the video, narrated by her Bill Clinton,
“ is wholly inappropriate, disrespectful and disturbing …using an image of blessed Mother Teresa as a political tool, especially given their radically different views on abortion…Mother Teresa tirelessly fought to protect unborn children, while Hillary Clinton staunchly supports abortion on demand in all nine months of pregnancy, including partial birth abortion and taxpayer funding of abortion ”
When the image of Hillary and Mother Teresa appears in the video the former president is heard saying “Hillary, in effect, was the face of America … in India;” the video then cuts to a clip of the former first lady addressing the 1995 Beijing Conference where an effort was made to declare abortion a fundamental “human right.”

The noted newspaper which covers legislative affairs, The Hill, reported Hillary Clinton received more earmarks for Congressional pork barrel projects than only one other United States Senator. Reforming the earmark process had been among the Democrats top priorities in the 110th Congress, up until the time Democrats voted to rescind the rules aimed at reform that were passed in the first 100 hours of the new Congress in January. Ethics reform and the earmark process is widely attributed as the cause why Republicans lost control of both Houses of Congress after several members had been caught up in ethical scandals. The Hill reported Sen. Clinton received 26 earmarks worth about $148.4 million total, much going to Pentagon contractors. [31]

In January 2006 Hillary Clinton’s New York Senate 2000 campaign was fined $35,000 for failing to accurately report $721,895 in contributions. [27]

Although Hillary Clinton told CBS’s Steve Kroft in an interview on 60 Minutes to address her husband’s infidelity, Clinton emphatically stated,
“ I’m not sitting here – some little woman standing by my man like Tammy Wynette. [20] ”
Clinton likewise mocked stay-at-home-moms for baking cookies while she was employed at a “high powered” law firm making more money than her husband. She was lauded by liberal media and pundits as “a strong women.”
In the end, when confronted with the infidelity of her husband, she blamed “a vast right-wing conspiracy” and stood by her man.
‘Why didn’t you leave the White House when you found out about the cheating of your husband?’ Gaddafi’s daughter Aisha Gaddafi.

Hillary Clinton branded opponents of the Administration and critics of the Clinton’s scandalous lifestyles as “a vast right-wing conspiracy.” White House staffers made up an enemies list of persons and organizations who subsequently endured IRS audits and harassment. [19]

During Bill Clinton’s presidency, Hillary initially played an important role. Immediately after his inauguration in 1993, she led a task force to create a national health care system. The secrecy of the Task Force was at issue in court cases which resulted in disclosures to comply with the law.
Her friend Vince Foster supervised the defense of the litigation, but died under mysterious circumstances at the height of the controversy; the death was ruled a suicide by the U.S Park Service. The Task Force proposals lacked public support and support from the Democrats in Congress, and came to nothing but an embarrassment for the Clinton presidency. Subsequently, the Republicans won a landslide victory in 1994, taking over both Houses of CongressAfter the death of White House staffer Vince Foster, 20 year Secret Service veteran Henry O’ Neill testified before Congress he observed as Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff, Margaret Williams, carry boxes of papers out of Foster’s office and up to the White House residence quarters on First Lady Hillary Clinton’s instructions. The documents related to the Clinton’s blind trust and White House real estate investments. Under oath, Hillary Clinton denied issuing the instructions or receiving the documents. The documents were now considered evidence in the investigation of the death of Vince Foster.
Two years later, some of the documents were retrieved from the private White House quarters. FBI investigators determined Hillary Clinton’s fingerprints were on the documents.[18]

The Hill magazine reported Hillary Clinton may have been involved in civil rights violations by monitoring illegal wiretaps and domestic spying on political opponents during the 1992 camapaign.[13] After the revelations came to light in a book entitled, Her Way [4] by Don Van Natta Jr., an investigative reporter at the New York Times, and Jeff Gerth, who spent 30 years as an investigative reporter at the paper, a Republican official remarked,
“ it is rather unbelievable that [Hillary] Clinton would listen in to conversations being conducted by political opponents, but refuse to allow our intelligence agencies to listen in to conversations being conducted by terrorists as they plot and plan to kill us.[14]

Now a poem concerning Jezebel

Though she was a “Woman in Charge”, she became crap of the dogs but the hands and feet that remained, found a new home abroad. Across ocean and sea till they found their new home, in the Senate 2001, they finally rested under the dome. The year was 1947 soon after the war a time of rejoicing, maybe buy me a car. So cute and adorable in her new form but the evil within was of old and with blood well adorned. The murderous spirit rested neither night nor day from it’s millions of dead babies and Vince Foster, who stood in her way. She sought to be commander and chief her primary goal from of old, so to destroy even more than the scriptures have told. They say history repeats and as a student thereof I must say, perhaps this time in our own blood at the end of the day.

Too late, times up, your F grade due to apathy. Next subject: The Phoenician Princess Jezebel, wife of Ahab, good luck!

With Hillary out of the White House in 2000, and all attention focused on George Bush, the question of Hillary’s sexuality temporarily vanished. When Hillary started making moves towards the White House in 2007, though, people again began to speculate. This time, those wondering if Hillary had been living a lie (in addition to constantly telling lies) focused on one person: Huma Abedin.
If Huma’s name seems familiar to you, it’s because she is married to Anthony Weiner, the Congressman forced to resign after he tweeted naked pictures of himself to other women. Huma stood by her man, and is now orchestrating his current attempt to get elected as Mayor of New York. You may also recognize Huma’s name because Rep. Michelle Bachmann (R., Minn.) called to have her investigated. The media tried to turn this back on Bachmann, claiming that she was engaged in a crazed Muslim witch hunt, but Bachmann had a very good reason for seeking this investigation: Huma has worked closely with Hillary Clinton since 1996, when she started in the White House an intern. Since then, the two have been inseparable when it comes to work. Wherever Hillary goes, Huma goes. This means that Huma was Hillary’s closest aide when Hillary became Secretary of State. Anyone who is the Secretary of State’s right-hand woman should have some scrutiny. This is especially true when the right-hand woman has a long and deep history with the Muslim Brotherhood. Although born in the United States, Huma grew up in Saudi Arabia, intellectual and financial home of Wahhabism, one of the most extreme forms of Islam. While the family was in Saudi Arabia, Abudullah Omar Naseef, who was affiliated with both al Qaeda and the Muslim World League, recruited her parents to start an organization called “The Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs” (“IMMA”). Abedin’s parents are still associated with the IMMA. The IMMA’s purpose is to stop Muslims who have immigrated to the West from assimilating into Western societies. Andrew C. McCarthy (who prosecuted the 1993 World Trade Center bombings) says that the IMMA has one specific, overriding goal: “to grow an unassimilated, aggressive population of Islamic supremacists who will gradually but dramatically alter the character of the West.”
When Huma attended George Washington University, she became an executive board member for its Muslim Students Association, an organization affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood. After she graduated, in addition to her work with Hillary Clinton, she also served as an assistant editor for the IMMA’s Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, leaving only in 2009 to join Hillary at the State Department. When she moved to the State Department, no one seemed to think twice about Huma’s connection with Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda affiliated organizations. The more titillating question for most people has been whether Huma and Hillary are now, or ever have been, lovers. Rumors about their relationship have never stopped swirling in political circles. For example, in 2007, it seemed a little too coincidental when Hillary, Huma, and openly gay talk-show host Ellen DeGeneris got together for a “girls’ only” weekend trip to D.C. That year – 2007 – was the same year that the National Enquirer broke the story about John Edward’s affair, scuttling his presidential aspirations. Rumor had it that the LA Times was sitting on another major story (and is sitting on it to this day). Best bets among the politically knowledgeable back in 2007 were that it was a story about Hillary’s sexuality.

Please note that this article was copied from a site, and is not my words.

“If it looks and walks and quacks like a duck….”

Obama is speaking this afternoon at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst. This mouthful is known more commonly as Fort Dix.

Obama has an unusual connection to this place, which makes his appearance there eerie, to say the least.

Obama began his first Illinois state senate bid with a meet-and-greet in the Chicago home of Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. Obama could not have picked a harder-Left living room in America in which to stage his first campaign reception. Ayers and Dohrn were co-founders of the 1960s radical group the Weather Underground.

Ayers has described himself as follows:

“I’m a radical, Leftist, small ‘c’ communist.”

In 1970, Ayers summarized the Weathermen’s philosophy: “Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home. Kill your parents.”

For her part, Dohrn was hardly a typical, midwestern housewife.

“There’s no way to be committed to non-violence in the middle of the most violent society that history’s ever created,” Dohrn declared in 1969. “I am not committed to non-violence in any way.”

Ayers, Dohrn, and the Weathermen went on a bombing campaign that blasted the Pentagon, the State Department, Gulf Oil’s Pittsburgh headquarters, San Francisco’s Presidio military base, and New York’s Queens Courthouse.

One of the Weather Underground’s bombs went off early, thank God.

Weathermen (Weatherpersons?) Ted Gold, Diana Oughton (Ayers’s then-girlfriend), and Terry Robbins, fatally detonated themselves on March 6, 1970. They were constructing a bomb inside a townhouse at 18 West 11th Street in Greenwich Village. Within the debris, cops discovered an anti-tank shell and 60 sticks of dynamite.

What was their target?

Were they better bomb makers, Ayers’s comrades would have set off a nail-filled bomb at a dance for non-commissioned officers and their dates and spouses at Fort Dix. As Ayers has observed, the bomb would have ripped “through windows and walls and, yes, people too.”

That bomb never went off, fortunately enough.

And today, one of Bill Ayers’s protégés is America’s commander-in-chief, addressing GIs at the same military facility that Ayers & Co. tried to blast to bits.

The circle of radicalism is complete.

Still don’t get it?

This book is about the man who mentored Obama from ages 10 to 17. Should be a good read for you and your small children as a bedtime story. Whenever I’m feeling too happy or just need a good nights rest I just read a few chapters and I’m right as rain.

BOOK: ‘The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis, The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor’
6 Sep 2012
This is the third in a series of exclusive interviews with Dr. Paul Kengor, Cold War historian and professor of political science, on his blockbuster book, The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis, The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor. The Communist is based on declassified material from Soviet archives, FBI files, and archived articles from Communist Party publications. Among the material reproduced in Kengor’s book are reports from Davis’s 600-page FBI file listing Davis’s Communist Party number: 47544. Kengor’s book provides stunning information that the mainstream media has carefully avoided. Like’s Vetting project, Kengor’s exposé is doing the vetting of Obama that the pro-Obama media refuses to do. Professor Kengor, our focus today is how Barack Obama’s communist mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, relates to this week’s Democratic convention. Our last interview focused on the troika of Obama, David Axelrod, and Valerie Jarrett, all of which have common political ancestors in Chicago’s Communist Party circles in the 1940s. Pick up with just a quick summary of that.

Kengor: Sure. In the 1940s, Obama’s Hawaiian mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, was extremely active in Chicago Communist Party fronts, campaigns, and newspapers. He worked alongside the political ancestors of David Axelrod, Obama’s chief strategist, and Valerie Jarrett, Obama’s closest adviser. For Axelrod, the political ancestors were the Canter family, Harry and David Canter–so far to the left that they actually lived in Moscow and worked for Stalin’s government just before relocating to Chicago. The Canter family mentored David Axelrod in Chicago in the 1970s. For Jarrett, the link to Frank Marshall Davis was her grandfather, Robert Taylor, and her father-in-law, Vernon Jarrett, who worked with Davis in various Communist Party campaigns and causes. And there’s no question about this. You document it meticulously.
Kengor: No question whatsoever. In the book, I have hundreds of endnotes from primary sources, and especially from Congressional reports. In those days, by the way, it was Democrats who ran these committees. In turn, Frank Marshall Davis and his comrades tarred and feathered Democrats. It was Harry Truman and the Democrats who ran the White House at the start of the Cold War; in other words, they stood in the way of Stalin. And so, guys like Frank Marshall Davis, who were literal Communist Party USA members–meaning they swore a loyalty oath to the Soviet Union, to a “Soviet America,” and to the “triumph of Soviet power in the United States”–trashed the Democrats. This is one of the most fascinating themes in your book. As you note, it was Democrats who summoned the likes of Frank Marshall Davis to Washington to testify on their pro-Soviet activities.
Kengor: That’s correct. When Davis was called to Washington to testify in December 1956, it was by the Democrat-run Senate Judiciary Committee. These were the old Cold War anti-communist Democrats. Back then, the Democratic Party was still the party of Harry Truman and John F. Kennedy and other great anti-communists like Pat McCarran and Thomas Dodd, the late father of Chris Dodd. But it gets better. In your book, you document how Frank Marshall Davis and other communists decided to leave the Communist Party for the Democratic Party. Why did they do that?
Kengor: Because they realized that they could never get elected as members of the Communist Party. So, they targeted the one of the two dominant political parties that leaned to the left: the Democrats.
One of the most remarkable things in Frank Marshall Davis’s declassified 600-page FBI file is a report from April 1950. It records that “members of the subversive element in Honolulu”–that is, communists–“were concentrating their efforts on infiltration of the Democratic Party through control of Precinct Clubs and organizations.” These communist subversives were pushing “their candidates in these Precinct Club elections.” One of these subversives was Davis, Obama’s mentor. According to the report, on April 6, 1950, one such candidate, Frank Marshall Davis, was elected “assistant secretary and delegate” to the Territorial Democratic Convention in his Precinct Club. That particular precinct was the Third Precinct of the Fifth District. And, for the record, as the FBI file shows, Davis, in fact, attended that convention on April 30, 1950. How many communists did this–moved into the Democratic Party?
Kengor: It’s impossible to say. I wish we knew. But we know that many of them did. One of them was Obama’s mentor, Frank Marshall Davis. You argue that this slow but sure infiltration of the Democratic Party moved the party much farther to the left, to where it is today.
Kengor: Absolutely. For American communists who supported this infiltration, it was this migration–and much more–that helped transform the Democratic Party from the party of Harry Truman and JFK to the party of Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama. That’s where we are today. The culmination of a long march–to borrow from Anita Dunn’s favorite philosopher, Mao Tse-Tung. Are you saying that Frank Marshall Davis trained Obama in this subversion of the Democratic Party?
Kengor: No, not at all. I can’t say that. If that happened, I certainly have no proof. We can’t say for certain whether Davis influenced any sort of political strategy by Obama. I do find it very noteworthy, however, that Obama–as I show in the book–was probably a Marxist when he left Davis for Occidental College in 1979 (though not an actual Party member), and we do know, thanks to Stanley Kurtz’s digging, that Obama joined the socialist New Party in January 1996. Only after all of that did Obama end up as the current head of the Democratic Party.
So, in a way, Obama may have followed Frank Marshall Davis’s footsteps, even if inadvertently, by moving away from communist ties to, instead, the mainstream Democratic Party. That alone is a fascinating parallel to Davis. Do you see any other parallel to Davis that you believe will be on display at the Democratic convention this week, or at least to Obama and Axelrod and the Obama campaign?
Kengor: Yes. When you hear the continued class rhetoric, the unceasing class warfare, the vilification of Mitt Romney’s business record, the relentless bashing of Wall Street, profits, and even the line of attack used against Paul Ryan, that’s all classic rhetoric reminiscent of Frank Marshall Davis and the mentors of these folks. It sounds exactly like them. The walls of the Democratic convention this week will resound with the same kind of class-warfare rhetoric that these old communists used to vilify their opponents in Chicago in the 1940s. The rhetoric is often hauntingly similar. This is not your grandfather’s Democratic Party.
Read More Stories About:
Big Government, White House, Chicago, Valerie Jarrett

Do you get it yet?

Obama’s spokesman stated that Obama would not be visiting Netanyahu and Israel in the near future because they are trying very hard not to influence their upcoming elections. The administration is furious that Netanyahu has been invited to speak to the House of Representatives (maybe they won’t make him exit out the back door like Obama did before) about needing sanction against Iran to keep them from becoming a nuclear power. This doesn’t seem consistent with all his prior behaviors.

HYMAN: Obama’s Kenya ghosts
By – The Washington Times – Sunday, October 12, 2008

About 50 parishioners were locked into the Assemblies of God church before it was set ablaze. They were mostly women and children. Those who tried to flee were hacked to death by machete-wielding members of a mob numbering 2,000.

The 2008 New Year Day atrocity in the Kenyan village Eldoret, about 185 miles northwest of Nairobi, had all the markings of the Rwanda genocide of a decade earlier.

By mid-February 2008, more than 1,500 Kenyans were killed. Many were slain by machete-armed attackers. More than 500,000 were displaced by the religious strife. Villages lay in ruin. Many of the atrocities were perpetrated by Muslims against Christians.

The violence was led by supporters of Raila Odinga, the opposition leader who lost the Dec. 27, 2007, presidential election by more than 230,000 votes. Odinga supporters began the genocide hours after the final election results were announced Dec. 30. Mr. Odinga was a member of Parliament representing an area in western Kenya, heavily populated by the Luo tribe, and the birthplace of Barack Obama’s father.

Mr. Odinga had the backing of Kenya’s Muslim community heading into the election. For months he denied any ties to Muslim leaders, but fell silent when Sheik Abdullahi Abdi, chairman of the National Muslim Leaders Forum, appeared on Kenya television displaying a memorandum of understanding signed on Aug. 29, 2007, by Mr. Odinga and the Muslim leader. Mr. Odinga then denied his denials.

The details of the MOU were shocking. In return for Muslim backing, Mr. Odinga promised to impose a number of measures favored by Muslims if he were elected president. Among these were recognition of “Islam as the only true religion,” Islamic leaders would have an “oversight role to monitor activities of ALL other religions [emphasis in original],” installation of Shariah courts in every jurisdiction, a ban on Christian preaching, replacement of the police commissioner who “allowed himself to be used by heathens and Zionists,” adoption of a women’s dress code, and bans on alcohol and pork.

This was not Mr. Odinga’s first brush with notoriety. Like his father, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga, the main opposition leader in the 1960s and 1970s, Raila Odinga is a Marxist He graduated from East Germany’s Magdeburg University in 1970 on a scholarship provided by the East German government. He named his oldest son after Fidel Castro.

Raila Odinga was implicated in the bloody coup attempt in 1982 against then-President Daniel Arap Moi, a close ally of the United States. Kenya has been one of the most stable democracies in Africa since the 1960s. The ethnic cleansing earlier this year was the worst violence in Kenya since that 1982 coup attempt.

Mr. Odinga spent eight years in prison. At the time, he denied guilt but later detailed he was a coup leader in his 2006 biography. Statue of limitations precluded further prosecution when the biography appeared.

Initially, Mr. Odinga was not the favored opposition candidate to stand in the 2007 election against President Mwai Kibaki, who was seeking his second term. However, he received a tremendous boost when Sen. Barack Obama arrived in Kenya in August 2006 to campaign on his behalf. Mr. Obama denies that supporting Mr. Odinga was the intention of his trip, but his actions and local media reports tell otherwise.

Mr. Odinga and Mr. Obama were nearly inseparable throughout Mr. Obama’s six-day stay. The two traveled together throughout Kenya and Mr. Obama spoke on behalf of Mr. Odinga at numerous rallies. In contrast, Mr. Obama had only criticism for Kibaki. He lashed out against the Kenyan government shortly after meeting with the president on Aug. 25. “The [Kenyan] people have to suffer over corruption perpetrated by government officials,” Mr. Obama announced.

“Kenyans are now yearning for change,” he declared. The intent of Mr. Obama’s remarks and actions was transparent to Kenyans – he was firmly behind Mr. Odinga.

Mr. Odinga and Mr. Obama had met several times before the 2006 trip. Reports indicate Mr. Odinga visited Mr. Obama during trips to the U.S. in 2004, 2005 and 2006. Mr. Obama sent his foreign policy adviser Mark Lippert to Kenya in early 2006 to coordinate his summer visit. Mr. Obama’s August trip coincided with strategizing by Orange Democratic Movement leaders to defeat Mr. Kibaki in the upcoming elections. Mr. Odinga represented the ODM ticket in the presidential race.

Mr. Odinga and Mr. Obama’s father were both from the Luo community, the second-largest tribe in Kenya, but their ties run much deeper. Mr. Odinga told a stunned BBC Radio interviewer the reason why he and Mr. Obama were staying in near daily telephone contact was because they were cousins. In a Jan. 8, 2008, interview, Mr. Odinga said Mr. Obama had called him twice the day before while campaigning in the New Hampshire primary before adding, “Barack Obama’s father is my maternal uncle.”

President Kibaki requested a meeting of all opposition leaders in early January in an effort to quell the violence. All agreed to attend except Mr. Odinga. A month later, Mr. Kibaki offered Mr. Odinga the role of prime minister, the de facto No. 2 in the Kenyan government, in return for an end to the attacks. Mr. Odinga was sworn in on April 17, 2008.

Mr. Obama’s judgment is seriously called into question when he backs an official with troubling ties to Muslim extremists and whose supporters practice ethnic cleansing and genocide. It was Islamic extremists in Kenya who bombed the U.S. Embassy in 1998, killing more than 200 and injuring thousands. None of this has dissuaded Mr. Obama from maintaining disturbing loyalties.

Mark Hyman is an award-winning news commentator for Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc.

Read more:
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

“Why would a man say something when he could just as easily say nothing?”

Pro 26:4 Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him. Pro 26:5 Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit. Mat 7:6 Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you. 2Ti 2:22 Flee also youthful lusts: but follow righteousness, faith, charity, peace, with them that call on the Lord out of a pure heart. 2Ti 2:23 But foolish and unlearned questions avoid, knowing that they do gender strifes. 2Ti 2:24 And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, 2Ti 2:25 In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth; 2Ti 2:26 And that they may recover themselves out of the snare of the devil, who are taken captive by him at his will. Psa 46:1 To the chief Musician for the sons of Korah, A Song upon Alamoth. God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble. Psa 46:2 Therefore will not we fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea; Psa 46:3 Though the waters thereof roar and be troubled, though the mountains shake with the swelling thereof. Selah. Psa 46:4 There is a river, the streams whereof shall make glad the city of God, the holy place of the tabernacles of the most High. Psa 46:5 God is in the midst of her; she shall not be moved: God shall help her, and that right early. Psa 46:6 The heathen raged, the kingdoms were moved: he uttered his voice, the earth melted. Psa 46:7 The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge. Selah. Psa 46:8 Come, behold the works of the LORD, what desolations he hath made in the earth. Psa 46:9 He maketh wars to cease unto the end of the earth; he breaketh the bow, and cutteth the spear in sunder; he burneth the chariot in the fire. Psa 46:10 Be still, and know that I am God: I will be exalted among the heathen, I will be exalted in the earth. Psa 46:11 The LORD of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge. Selah

The Two Faces Of The Jihadi

The Muslims have a doctrine of Taqiyya (lying) that allows them to deliberately decieve their enemies (everyone that is not a Muslim) in order to further the cause of Islam. You can observe them using this constantly when communicating with Westerners. The face their insurgents (Muslim Brotherhood) frequently use speaks of peace, fairness, equal rights, acceptance and other hot buttons that they know the Westerners like to hear but when speaking to their own people, their face changes 180 degrees. They have been bold with this two faced technique because they know very few Westerners understand Arabic or will pay attention or report on it, especially not the main stream media. You should check out a web site labeled Memri. They translate into English what they are saying to their people in Arabic. You will swear it is two different people with the same face. One thing to note is that as they come out of the closet more and more under the protective umbrella of the Obama administration they will be more straight forward and direct. These are all classic, historical behaviors of the Islamic religion. Perhaps you should look into it. Another thing you need to know is the Muslim doctrine of abrogation. This one may be my favorite (the Mormans have this one also). How convenient is that? God changes his mind every time you need him to. The beginning scriptures of Islam are relatively peaceful towards Jews and Christians but as the false prophet gained more political and military strength the scriptures become deadly. In their religion the older verses are abrogated by the more recent ones. So the peaceful verses no longer apply unless you need to decieve the infidels into thinking you are a religion of peace. This all reminds me of an old song, The Back Stabers. The words went “they smile in your face all the time they want to take your place the back Stabers”.  A little trip down memory lane back to Motown. Maybe we should make this our new national anthem if the Jidadis win. Good luck with that. Thought you should know.

Too Little Too Late

It appears that quite a few Frenchmen were marching in solidarity recently over the French cartoonist being killed by the Muslims. The president that they elected though seemed, from his comments, more concerned with Islamophobia. He wished the people would be as concerned about Islamophobia as they were about the cartoonist being killed. First of all, this term (Islamophobia) was created deep within the bowels of Muslim propaganda think tanks. It is not even a real word. It is meant to trick and to play to the multi-cultural ideological indoctrination the West has undergone.  This is all the result of the counter insurgency of the communist infiltrators that took over all their institutions and have been educating their children from long ago. The Russians must be tickled pink at their success. There are many things to say concerning this. Let me start with lighting their false doctrine of multi-culturalism. They have been importing their muslim enemies from North Africa and other Muslim nations for a long time now. They must have forgotten their history of what the Muslims did in those regions in past times. There were wars fought because of the Muslims at great cost. They have refused to take the Muslims at their word. Instead they insist that Islam is a religion of peace even though the Imams continually tell them they they are going to kill them some day. Maybe they can convince the Muslims not to believe their scriptures and their prophet but instead to swing over to the multi-cultural philosophy. This will not happen no matter how much wishing they do. They have done this at their own peril. When someone says they want and are going to kill you, you should take them at their word. If only the Jews had done this with Hitler. Anyway, because of this philosophy, the French now have more that 700 no go zones where the French Government cannot go. These are enclaves of Muslims that enforce Sharia law instead of French law right in the middle of France. They are nations right in the middle of another nation. If a women is being beaten and raped continually by her husband in these regions she will have to go before a Sharia court instead of a French court and they will rule in favor of the husband (do you think this upsets the feminist? You know it doesn’t. Why?). Maybe she can somehow immigrate to America but there have also been a number of Sharia rulings made in American courts that you are unaware of because the media hides this. You will have to research for about 10 minutes on your own instead of being spoon fed by the communist owned media if you want the details. Maybe try google. Another consideration is that the French have had no concern for all the babies they are killing through abortion but they do have a concern over one French cartoonist that was killed. They don’t really care about the cartoonist either but only that the violence is starting to get close to them. They also don’t seem too concerned about their government stealing from the so called rich through massive taxes and redistributing to the masses even if those dirty rich people earned their money honestly. Do you think they would care if it were them that were being robbed? The French also have a very low birth rate, well below 2 per family (you wouldn’t want anything to interfere with your narcissistic life and goals). The Muslims because of their doctrine and religion have many more than 2 per family. This is part of the Islamic religion, to conquer your enemies from within by a high birth rate. It takes few generations but the results are guaranteed. The indigenous French population is aging greatly because they don’t have children (heck, if I lived in France I might not want any children either. They would be the property of the State and educated in their leftist schools) but the Muslims have a much lower median age because they have many children per family. Maybe closer towards the end the 60+ year old Frenchmen can fight with the 20 something year old Muslims and somehow win. I’ll put my money on the 20 year olds. Again, the French love free speech as long as you are not saying what is 100 percent right. You might be able to get away with saying something that is 50 percent right. There are many other things to say on these matters but maybe we should clean up our own backyard instead of starting in on that of the French lest we end up like them. We are usually about 15 years behind Europe in their moral decline but that figure may be accelerating as the vortex tightens. He who has ears to hear, let him hear. Psa 9:17 The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.