One of the fundamental tenants of communism is the redistribution of wealth. Carl Marx stated “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” This redistribution of wealth is always a one way street and never voluntary. It is never their money being redistributed but always the other guys. Their wealth and power always continues to grow. It is sold as charity and fairness. They take from the few and give to the many to buy the support of the many, while losing only the support of the few. It translates as: I’m taking your property for my benefit; in other words, stealing your property. As Obama puts it “paying your fair share.” So somehow, while stealing your property (your money is your property), they claim they are being fair. Since when is stealing fair? Remember, in order to understand the meaning of what communists/liberals/progressives are saying you have to rotate the words 180 degrees. The first communist and the father of lies, Lucifer, created the necessity for the 180 degree translation twist. God said “But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.” “The serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.” To bad for them and us that they did not know how to do the 180 translation twist. If they had just known how to spin the devil’s words around 180 degrees we would never have been in all this trouble. Before this time there was no need for this type of translation because the lie had not yet been invented.
Now consider the words of Jesus: “For the kingdom of heaven is as a man travelling into a far country, who called his own servants, and delivered unto them his goods. And unto one he gave five talents, to another two, and to another one; to every man according to his several ability; and straightway took his journey. Then he that had received the five talents went and traded with the same, and made them other five talents. And likewise he that had received two, he also gained other two. But he that had received one went and digged in the earth, and hid his lord’s money. After a long time the lord of those servants cometh, and reckoneth with them. And so he that had received five talents came and brought other five talents, saying, Lord, thou deliveredst unto me five talents: behold, I have gained beside them five talents more. His lord said unto him, Well done, thou good and faithful servant: thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord. He also that had received two talents came and said, Lord, thou deliveredst unto me two talents: behold, I have gained two other talents beside them. His lord said unto him, Well done, good and faithful servant; thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things: enter thou into the joy of thy lord. Then he which had received the one talent came and said, Lord, I knew thee that thou art an hard man, reaping where thou hast not sown, and gathering where thou hast not strewed: And I was afraid, and went and hid thy talent in the earth: lo, there thou hast that is thine. His lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful servant, thou knewest that I reap where I sowed not, and gather where I have not strawed: Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury. Take therefore the talent from him, and give it unto him which hath ten talents. For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath. And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.” You don’t suppose the Lord was one of those “fat cats” that Obama and other communists have belittled do you? Why would He take the talent from the guy that only had one and give it to the guy who had ten already? Shouldn’t he have at least given it to the guy who only had two? Why should the guy who already has ten talents be given one more and then have abundance above the rest? This just doesn’t seem fair. Did the Lord not know the words of Carl Marx?
Now consider this lest your money perish with you: If a man gives his property (money, etc.) from his own free will, not coercion, to someone in need because of his faith in Jesus and love for God, he shall receive a reward from his maker. If someone takes another’s money and gives it to someone else in order to gain a profit in some way for himself, he is a thief, and shall add to his eternal torment.
A quote from John Adams states that “The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the law of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence.”
Obama, like his beloved mentor Frank Marshall Davis, utterly despised Winston Churchill. His disdain went to the point that he removed the bust of Churchill that was in the oval office and had it sent back to Britain. The reason they hated Churchill so much can perhaps be summed up in this one quote from Churchill: “Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”