“Lion of the Senate”?

Fellow democrats referred to the late Senator Kennedy as the “Lion of the Senate”. This is the usual false portrayal fellow communists give to their comrades, lest the public should become aware of who they really are. By referring to him this way, they disrespect this noble creature. When it kills, it makes no apology and has no remorse. It is what it is and is exactly what it is supposed to be. Kennedy; on the other hand, is exactly the opposite of how the liberal media portrays him and exactly the opposite of how he ought to have been. He murdered millions through abortion and called it “a women’s choice”. He stole untold wealth from the public and called it compassion, as if he were redistributing his own money and not that of others. He voted for every communist cause that ever came down the pike and yet called himself a patriotic American. He was a renowned womanizer, like his brother and father, cheating on his spouse and yet was portrayed as a moral man by the leftist media. If you can think of any other heinous behaviors that are common to man, a quick study of history will reveal that it abounded in this man. There was no fear of God before his eyes. Remember, communism is an ideology that uses euphemisms to hide their true intentions. If they came right out and said who they are and what they believed, people would either run away or string them up by the neck post haste. Being fully aware of this, they hide in the shadows and use code words that have a 180 degree different meaning to the insiders than they do to the public dupes. They present themselves as angels of light but are whited sepulchers. “Hope” = Despair under communism for a good future, “Change” = Devolving to tyranny, “Forward” = Backward to a failed ideology, “Workers of the World Unite” = Overthrow of law,order, and of society itself. “Yes We Can” = Yes we can change human nature from what God created us to be into what we as communists think it should be (example: women are the same as men). “Social Justice” = Communism/Redistribution of wealth (does that sound like justice to you?). The communists have been using these same buzz words all around the world for decades, from the middle east, through the Far East, to Central America, to America. “The end justifies the means” in all their efforts to foment the overthrow of governments all over the world. Unsurprisingly, this formula has been very successful because of the desperately wicked condition of the heart of man. Jer.17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?

Of an absolute truth, Kennedy was a Lion for the goals of the international one world communists. I suppose he thought he would profit himself by so being. How short sighted. “For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?” and where now are the multiple millions of dollars that this man possessed? and do those who now have his money consider God? They will be gone soon as well. Do they consider this?
Psalm 50
1 A Psalm of Asaph. The mighty God, even the LORD, hath spoken, and called the earth from the rising of the sun unto the going down thereof.
2 Out of Zion, the perfection of beauty, God hath shined.
3 Our God shall come, and shall not keep silence: a fire shall devour before him, and it shall be very tempestuous round about him.
4 He shall call to the heavens from above, and to the earth, that he may judge his people.
5 Gather my saints together unto me; those that have made a covenant with me by sacrifice.
6 And the heavens shall declare his righteousness: for God is judge himself. Selah.
7 Hear, O my people, and I will speak; O Israel, and I will testify against thee: I am God, even thy God.
8 I will not reprove thee for thy sacrifices or thy burnt offerings, to have been continually before me.
9 I will take no bullock out of thy house, nor he goats out of thy folds.
10 For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills.
11 I know all the fowls of the mountains: and the wild beasts of the field are mine.
12 If I were hungry, I would not tell thee: for the world is mine, and the fulness thereof.
13 Will I eat the flesh of bulls, or drink the blood of goats?
14 Offer unto God thanksgiving; and pay thy vows unto the most High:
15 And call upon me in the day of trouble: I will deliver thee, and thou shalt glorify me.
16 But unto the wicked God saith, What hast thou to do to declare my statutes, or that thou shouldest take my covenant in thy mouth?
17 Seeing thou hatest instruction, and castest my words behind thee.
18 When thou sawest a thief, then thou consentedst with him, and hast been partaker with adulterers.
19 Thou givest thy mouth to evil, and thy tongue frameth deceit.
20 Thou sittest and speakest against thy brother; thou slanderest thine own mother’s son.
21 These things hast thou done, and I kept silence; thou thoughtest that I was altogether such an one as thyself: but I will reprove thee, and set them in order before thine eyes.
22 Now consider this, ye that forget God, lest I tear you in pieces, and there be none to deliver.
23 Whoso offereth praise glorifieth me: and to him that ordereth his conversation aright will I shew the salvation of God.

Consider reading this article found in THE BLAZE (do these democrats have no shame?):

The outrage over the letter sent by 47 U.S. senators to Iran’s leaders has been called everything from “unprecedented” to “treasonous.”

But is it treason? Is it unprecedented?

Based on a story first published in 1991, the letter organized by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) and signed by 46 Senate colleagues does not mark the first time an elected official has reached out to a foreign government involved in sensitive nuclear negotiations with a U.S. president.

In 1983, the late Sen. Ted Kennedy concocted a scheme meant not only to undermine President Ronald Reagan’s nuclear arms reduction talks with the Soviet Union, but to propel the senator into the catbird seat for the 1988 presidential election.

The Kennedy plan was only revealed after a treasure trove of documents from the dissolved Soviet empire was released. London Times reporter Tim Sebastian brought the story to the world in 1991, revealing a memo from then-KGB head Viktor Chebrikov to the Soviet leader, Yuri Andropov.

In the note, Chebrikov detailed Kennedy’s plan, presented in person, by former U.S. senator and close Kennedy friend, John Tunney. (Kennedy was the best man at Tunney’s 1977 wedding.)

Chebrikov’s account of two days in May 1983 included Tunney detailing a series of steps that would undermine Reagan’s negotiations with the Soviet leader while strengthening Kennedy’s position and making Democrats look like they were leading the push for a peaceful world, free of fear of a nuclear war between the U.S. and the Soviets.

The story didn’t receive too much attention until Peter Robinson’s opinion piece was carried in the New York Post and Forbes online in 2009.

Image: NY Post
Image source: New York Post
The Chebrikov memo stated that Kennedy is “very troubled by the current state of Soviet-American relations.” It added, “The main reason for this is Reagan’s belligerence, and his firm commitment to deploy new American middle range nuclear weapons within Western Europe.”

The memo went on:

According to Kennedy, the current threat is due to the President’s refusal to engage any modification on his politics. He feels that his domestic standing has been strengthened because of the well publicized improvement of the economy: inflation has been greatly reduced, production levels are increasing as is overall business activity. For these reasons, interest rates will continue to decline. The White House has portrayed this in the media as the “success of Reaganomics.”

The KGB leader noted that an economic slide in America could help the Democrats’ chances in the upcoming election:

A few well known economists and members of financial circles, particularly from the north-eastern states, foresee certain hidden tendencies that may bring about a new economic crisis in the USA. This could bring about the fall of the presidential campaign of 1984, which would benefit the Democratic party.

The Chebrikov memo also laid out a two-step proposal from Kennedy, presented by Tunney, to the Soviet leadership:

1. Kennedy asks Y.V. Andropov to consider inviting the senator to Moscow for a personal meeting in July of this year. The main purpose of the meeting, according to the senator, would be to arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA. He would also like to inform you that he has planned a trip through Western Europe, where he anticipates meeting England’s Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and French President Mitterand in which he will exchange similar ideas regarding the same issues.

In addition to the invitation from Andropov, Kennedy pledged to bring Republican Sen. Mark Hatfield, Kennedy’s partner on a 1982 proposed nuclear freeze between the U.S. and the USSR.

The second step in Kennedy’s plan involved bringing Andropov to the United States to speak directly to the American people:

2. Kennedy believes that in order to influence Americans it would be important to organize in August-September of this year, televised interviews with Y.V. Andropov in the USA. A direct appeal by the General Secretary to the American people will, without a doubt, attract a great deal of attention and interest in the country. The senator is convinced this would receive the maximum resonance in so far as television is the most effective method of mass media and information.

Kennedy pledged to make certain the biggest names in American television news would also air interviews with the Soviet leader, mentioning “television columnists Walter Cronkite or Barbara Walters could visit Moscow.”

The Kennedy proposal also included Tunney’s indication that Kennedy’s presidential aspirations were indeed real:

Tunney remarked that the senator wants to run for president in 1988. At that time, he will be 56 and his personal problems, which could hinder his standing, will be resolved (Kennedy has just completed a divorce and plans to remarry in the near future).

The proposal was apparently never seriously considered by Yuri Andropov; part of the reason it may have been ignored was the Soviet leader’s rapidly deteriorating health. Three months before Tunney took Kennedy’s plan to Moscow, Andropov reportedly experienced total renal failure. He was hospitalized in August 1983 and died in February 1984.

The entire memo appeared in Paul Kengor’s book, “The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism.” According to Kengor, its validity has not been questioned. Forbes quoted Kengor on the memo: ”I scrutinized it more carefully than anything I’ve ever dealt with as a scholar” and “I showed the document to numerous authorities who deal with Soviet archival material…No one has debunked the memorandum or shown it to be a forgery.”

Additionally, Kengor said, “Kennedy’s office did not deny it.”

But Ted Kennedy’s back-channel pitch to the Soviets isn’t the only such instance that shows Senate Republicans are not blazing entirely new ground. In 1984, 10 Democrats wrote a “Dear Commandante” letter to Nicaraguan leader Daniel Noriega. Rep. Newt Gingrich called this action “at best, unwise, at worst, illegal.”

And in 2007 — one year before Barack Obama was elected president — then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi paid a visit to a foreign leader against the wishes of President George W. Bush — to Syrian dictator Bashar Assad.

If you would like to read the entire letter go here: http://sweetness-light.com/archive/kgb-letter-details-kennedy-offer-to-ussr

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s